Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Young Kwak

Internal Medicine New Britain, CT Medical Doctor

NPI 1407182249 CMS profile 801848

300 Kensington Ave, New Britain, CT 06051

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$8,773

454 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Young Kwak of New Britain, CT is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $8,773 across 454 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 93rd percentile of Internal Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $2,518 116
2024 General $1,878 94
2023 General $1,781 88
2022 General $854 48
2021 General $109 5
2020 General $293 17
2019 General $1,340 86

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Young Kwak
  • Internal Medicine median
  • Middle half of Internal Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Young Kwak were reported at $2,518. Among 52,115 Internal Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $156 and the middle half received between $47 and $551.

Show as a table
Year Young Kwak Internal Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $1,340 $159 $48–$570 $163
2020 $293 $119 $33–$402 $114
2021 $109 $135 $37–$521 $132
2022 $854 $141 $42–$496 $149
2023 $1,781 $149 $45–$519 $160
2024 $1,878 $154 $47–$537 $164
2025 $2,518 $156 $47–$551 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $990 49 payments
  2. Novo Nordisk Inc $791 44 payments
  3. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $742 39 payments
  4. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $699 33 payments
  5. Pfizer Inc. $646 40 payments
  6. Abbott Laboratories $534 28 payments
  7. Lilly USA, LLC $498 24 payments
  8. AbbVie, Inc. $405 18 payments
  9. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc. $312 12 payments
  10. Salix Pharmaceuticals, a division of Bausch Health US, LLC $304 15 payments
  11. Other $2,852 152 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $8,773 454 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. TRELEGY ELLIPTA $745 35 payments
  2. Ozempic $465 30 payments
  3. FreeStyle Libre 3 $441 23 payments
  4. RYBELSUS $384 26 payments
  5. JARDIANCE $371 18 payments
  6. BREZTRI $343 14 payments
  7. Kerendia $312 12 payments
  8. XIFAXAN $304 15 payments
  9. ELIQUIS $304 19 payments
  10. NURTEC ODT $285 15 payments
  11. Other $7,103 389 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 150 drugs

Part D claims

10,718

Median for Internal Medicine: 777

Drug cost

$1,217,924

Median for Internal Medicine: $73,373

Branded share of claims

19.4%

Median for Internal Medicine: 19.3%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 158 $258,697
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 137 $191,121
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 103 $181,344
Januvia Sitagliptin Phosphate Brand 41 $67,904
Xarelto Rivaroxaban Brand 58 $60,662
Trulicity Dulaglutide Brand 31 $57,216
Mounjaro Tirzepatide Brand 32 $55,281
Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 28 $41,826
Rybelsus Semaglutide Brand 13 $37,031
Myrbetriq Mirabegron Brand 28 $31,822

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 150 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 104,182 Part D prescribers listed as Internal Medicine; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 19 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$49,729

Of which drugs: $1,588

Medicare patients

249

Average age 78

Services billed

653

123 women, 126 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 41%
Diabetes 27%
Ischemic heart disease 26%
Atrial fibrillation 24%
Chronic kidney disease 24%
Heart failure 18%
COPD 16%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Vaccine for influenza for injection into muscle 90662 Office 19 19 $1,555

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 34 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
TRELEGY ELLIPTA
  • GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $291
$291 21 —
JARDIANCE
  • Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $128
  • Lilly USA, LLC $117
$245 158 —
ELIQUIS
  • E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $74
  • PFIZER INC. $57
$131 137 —
VOQUEZNA
  • Phathom Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $85
$85 — —
Veozah
  • Astellas Pharma US Inc $78
$78 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 34 with Patron

Records

454 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Internal Medicine in Connecticut

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record