Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Youn Hee Kim

Dermatology Stanford, CA Medical Doctor

NPI 1770619355 CMS profile 306870

300 Pasteur Dr, Stanford, CA 94305

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$59,131

41 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$1,270

Paid to them · 2 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$1,480,249 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2019–2025

Through program year 2025, Youn Hee Kim of Stanford, CA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $59,131 across 41 general payments and $1,270 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $1,480,249 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 93rd percentile of Dermatology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $6,093 5
2024 Research $1,270 2
2023 General $570 3
2022 General $7,758 3
2021 General $1,482 1
2020 General $3,680 2
2019 General $39,548 27

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Youn Hee Kim
  • Dermatology median
  • Middle half of Dermatology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Youn Hee Kim were reported at $6,093. Among 10,363 Dermatology profiles paid that year, the median was $788 and the middle half received between $207 and $1,974.

Show as a table
Year Youn Hee Kim Dermatology median Middle half National median
2019 $39,548 $454 $129–$1,240 $163
2020 $3,680 $235 $81–$756 $114
2021 $1,482 $377 $108–$1,108 $132
2022 $7,758 $514 $143–$1,391 $149
2023 $570 $607 $159–$1,674 $160
2024 $0 $751 $204–$1,903 $164
2025 $6,093 $788 $207–$1,974 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Kyowa Kirin, Inc. $46,193 34 payments
  2. Almirall LLC $5,132 4 payments
  3. Kyowa Kirin Services Ltd $4,781 2 payments
  4. Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc. $3,025 1 payment

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Consulting Fee $50,630 14 payments
  2. Travel and Lodging $5,420 10 payments
  3. Honoraria $2,020 1 payment
  4. Food and Beverage $1,062 16 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. POTELIGEO $50,974 36 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Research payments came from Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Pfizer Inc. $1,270 2 payments

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 19 drugs

Part D claims

699

Median for Dermatology: 534

Drug cost

$188,283

Median for Dermatology: $67,151

Branded share of claims

20.6%

Median for Dermatology: 8.1%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Bexarotene Generic 39 $101,278
Opzelura Ruxolitinib Phosphate Brand 18 $39,154
Rasuvo Methotrexate/Pf Brand 34 $18,152
Acitretin Generic 51 $15,080
Clobetasol Propionate Generic 55 $3,262
Valacyclovir Valacyclovir Hcl Brand 40 $2,722
Triamcinolone Acetonide Generic 92 $1,670
Isotretinoin Generic 12 $1,434
Methotrexate Methotrexate Sodium Brand 52 $1,194
Gabapentin Generic 46 $966

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 19 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 13,550 Part D prescribers listed as Dermatology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 21 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$64,954

Medicare's payments for the services billed

Medicare patients

165

Average age 76

Services billed

717

85 women, 80 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 65%
Arthritis 36%
Ischemic heart disease 28%
Diabetes 25%
Osteoporosis 24%
Chronic kidney disease 22%
Atrial fibrillation 19%
Cancer 19%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Records

43 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Dermatology in California

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record