Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Yaohan Lam

Dermatology Oklahoma City, OK Medical Doctor

NPI 1285954305 CMS profile 827662

926 Sw 107Th St Ste 100, Oklahoma City, OK 73170

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$87,756

536 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$28,587

Paid to them · 3 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$1,033,193 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2019–2025

Through program year 2025, Yaohan Lam of Oklahoma City, OK is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $87,756 across 536 general payments and $28,587 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $1,033,193 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 95th percentile of Dermatology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

9 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $33,352 133
2024 General $26,437 134
2023 General $14,801 103
2022 General $11,797 88
2021 General $580 26
2020 General $190 11
2020 Research $74 1
2019 General $599 41
2019 Research $28,514 2

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Yaohan Lam
  • Dermatology median
  • Middle half of Dermatology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Yaohan Lam were reported at $33,352. Among 10,363 Dermatology profiles paid that year, the median was $788 and the middle half received between $207 and $1,974.

Show as a table
Year Yaohan Lam Dermatology median Middle half National median
2019 $599 $454 $129–$1,240 $163
2020 $190 $235 $81–$756 $114
2021 $580 $377 $108–$1,108 $132
2022 $11,797 $514 $143–$1,391 $149
2023 $14,801 $607 $159–$1,674 $160
2024 $26,437 $751 $204–$1,903 $164
2025 $33,352 $788 $207–$1,974 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Lilly USA, LLC $44,485 115 payments
  2. Incyte Corporation $36,906 63 payments
  3. LEO Pharma Inc. $935 49 payments
  4. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $860 58 payments
  5. Regeneron Healthcare Solutions, Inc. $693 23 payments
  6. Genzyme Corporation $616 22 payments
  7. Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc. $468 58 payments
  8. AbbVie, Inc. $412 20 payments
  9. Galderma Laboratories, L.P. $397 25 payments
  10. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $359 9 payments
  11. Other $1,623 94 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $74,475 43 payments
  2. Food and Beverage $9,440 468 payments
  3. Travel and Lodging $3,382 20 payments
  4. Education $459 5 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. EBGLYSS $37,158 68 payments
  2. OPZELURA $36,676 61 payments
  3. TALTZ $895 49 payments
  4. DUPIXENT Immunology $752 25 payments
  5. ADBRY $713 37 payments
  6. DUPIXENT Inflammation And Immunology $590 19 payments
  7. COSENTYX $590 40 payments
  8. OLUMIANT $504 24 payments
  9. Zoryve $332 47 payments
  10. TREMFYA $331 7 payments
  11. Other $3,141 175 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Research payments came from Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Eli Lilly and Company $28,587 3 payments

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 15 drugs

Part D claims

835

Median for Dermatology: 534

Drug cost

$26,732

Median for Dermatology: $67,151

Branded share of claims

1.3%

Median for Dermatology: 8.1%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Clobetasol Propionate Generic 160 $7,383
Tacrolimus Generic 27 $3,537
Fluorouracil Generic 51 $3,412
Doxycycline Hyclate Generic 92 $2,612
Ketoconazole Generic 168 $2,510
Calcipotriene Generic 15 $1,860
Triamcinolone Acetonide Generic 93 $1,255
Clindamycin Phosphate Generic 19 $899
Gabapentin Generic 48 $695
Dapsone Generic 17 $652

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 15 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 13,550 Part D prescribers listed as Dermatology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 50 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$153,615

Medicare's payments for the services billed

Medicare patients

854

Average age 74

Services billed

3,289

482 women, 372 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 47%
Ischemic heart disease 33%
Diabetes 31%
Chronic kidney disease 24%
Depression 19%
COPD 15%
Atrial fibrillation 14%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 14 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
OPZELURA
  • Incyte Corporation $9,801
$9,801 — —
ADBRY
  • LEO Pharma Inc. $222
$222 — —
COSENTYX
  • Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $203
$203 — —
DUPIXENT
  • Regeneron Healthcare Solutions, Inc. $98
  • GENZYME CORPORATION $81
$179 — —
Zoryve
  • Arcutis Biotherapeutics, Inc. $157
$157 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 14 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

539 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record