Doctor of Osteopathy Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Xu He

Internal Medicine Redlands, CA Doctor of Osteopathy

NPI 1568773448 CMS profile 1091181

1600 E Citrus Ave, Suite A, Redlands, CA 92374

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$351,128

1,805 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Xu He of Redlands, CA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $351,128 across 1,805 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 99th percentile of Internal Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $82,672 327
2024 General $75,334 275
2023 General $79,305 270
2022 General $41,750 241
2021 General $61,847 321
2020 General $3,118 164
2019 General $7,102 207

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Xu He
  • Internal Medicine median
  • Middle half of Internal Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Xu He were reported at $82,672. Among 52,115 Internal Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $156 and the middle half received between $47 and $551.

Show as a table
Year Xu He Internal Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $7,102 $159 $48–$570 $163
2020 $3,118 $119 $33–$402 $114
2021 $61,847 $135 $37–$521 $132
2022 $41,750 $141 $42–$496 $149
2023 $79,305 $149 $45–$519 $160
2024 $75,334 $154 $47–$537 $164
2025 $82,672 $156 $47–$551 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Otsuka America Pharmaceutical, Inc. $79,435 235 payments
  2. Biohaven Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $57,270 150 payments
  3. Pfizer Inc. $39,430 167 payments
  4. Biohaven Pharmaceutical Holding Company Ltd. $30,969 81 payments
  5. Idorsia Pharmaceuticals US Inc $23,772 55 payments
  6. Phathom Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $22,646 64 payments
  7. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $18,773 47 payments
  8. CeQur Corporation $16,612 9 payments
  9. Medicure Pharma Inc. $9,652 5 payments
  10. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc. $7,169 33 payments
  11. Other $45,400 959 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $231,527 135 payments
  2. Food and Beverage $44,739 1,371 payments
  3. Travel and Lodging $43,965 266 payments
  4. Consulting Fee $21,661 12 payments
  5. Honoraria $9,100 16 payments
  6. Education $136 5 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. NURTEC ODT Primary Care $88,239 231 payments
  2. REXULTI $80,492 238 payments
  3. QUVIVIQ $23,772 55 payments
  4. VOQUEZNA $22,564 56 payments
  5. NURTEC ODT Pain $22,184 65 payments
  6. CeQur Simplicity $16,612 9 payments
  7. ZAVZPRET $15,879 42 payments
  8. AREXVY $13,432 15 payments
  9. Kerendia $7,169 33 payments
  10. ImmunoCAP $5,127 25 payments
  11. Other $56,150 1,273 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 195 drugs

Part D claims

12,429

Median for Internal Medicine: 777

Drug cost

$1,412,555

Median for Internal Medicine: $73,373

Branded share of claims

25.3%

Median for Internal Medicine: 19.3%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 222 $177,182
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 148 $175,437
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 175 $139,655
Rybelsus Semaglutide Brand 71 $86,005
Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 89 $60,400
Kerendia Finerenone Brand 78 $59,308
Trulicity Dulaglutide Brand 54 $55,430
Nurtec Odt Rimegepant Sulfate Brand 35 $47,239
Xarelto Rivaroxaban Brand 59 $45,264
Soliqua 100-33 Insulin Glargine/Lixisenatide Brand 43 $42,625

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 195 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 104,182 Part D prescribers listed as Internal Medicine; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 36 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$21,024

Of which drugs: $2,554

Medicare patients

113

Average age 74

Services billed

451

56 women, 57 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 61%
Arthritis 36%
Diabetes 31%
Chronic kidney disease 23%
Depression 19%
Atrial fibrillation 18%
Heart failure 15%
Cancer 15%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 38 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
REXULTI
$29,452 13 —
VOQUEZNA
$14,013 — —
AREXVY
$13,314 15 —
Zypitamag
$3,078 — —
NURTEC ODT
$1,779 35 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 38 with Patron

Records

1,805 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Internal Medicine in California

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record