Doctor of Osteopathy Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

William Welsh

Geriatric Medicine Whittier, CA Doctor of Osteopathy

NPI 1568401255 CMS profile 206294

7624 Painter Ave, #100, Whittier, CA 90602

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$13,047

583 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$150

Paid to them · 1 record reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, William Welsh of Whittier, CA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $13,047 across 583 general payments and $150 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 96th percentile of Geriatric Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

8 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $1,548 68
2024 General $1,616 79
2023 General $1,714 81
2022 General $3,508 103
2021 General $1,937 103
2020 General $1,361 73
2020 Research $150 1
2019 General $1,364 76

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • William Welsh
  • Geriatric Medicine median
  • Middle half of Geriatric Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to William Welsh were reported at $1,548. Among 1,028 Geriatric Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $123 and the middle half received between $35 and $408.

Show as a table
Year William Welsh Geriatric Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $1,364 $122 $40–$435 $163
2020 $1,361 $98 $25–$349 $114
2021 $1,937 $125 $34–$441 $132
2022 $3,508 $124 $36–$408 $149
2023 $1,714 $121 $41–$383 $160
2024 $1,616 $134 $41–$435 $164
2025 $1,548 $123 $35–$408 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Biohaven Pharmaceutical Holding Company Ltd. $1,752 10 payments
  2. Amgen Inc. $1,138 51 payments
  3. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $1,020 57 payments
  4. Lilly USA, LLC $950 45 payments
  5. AbbVie, Inc. $867 45 payments
  6. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $780 40 payments
  7. Novo Nordisk Inc $690 45 payments
  8. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $492 23 payments
  9. Pfizer Inc. $459 26 payments
  10. Allergan Inc. $399 23 payments
  11. Other $4,502 218 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $11,613 579 payments
  2. Consulting Fee $1,200 1 payment
  3. Travel and Lodging $228 2 payments
  4. Education $6 1 payment
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. NURTEC ODT $1,796 12 payments
  2. Otezla $656 25 payments
  3. Ozempic $628 41 payments
  4. RYBELSUS $568 38 payments
  5. Repatha $534 25 payments
  6. TRELEGY ELLIPTA $489 26 payments
  7. FARXIGA $487 27 payments
  8. XIFAXAN $394 26 payments
  9. UBRELVY $389 20 payments
  10. AIMOVIG $355 15 payments
  11. Other $10,351 522 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Research payments came from Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Indivior Inc. $150 1 payment

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 212 drugs

Part D claims

17,768

Median for Family Practice: 1,826

Drug cost

$2,163,241

Median for Family Practice: $120,094

Branded share of claims

25.5%

Median for Family Practice: 18.9%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 415 $456,624
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 438 $343,225
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 171 $164,880
Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 111 $117,084
Trulicity Dulaglutide Brand 83 $94,395
Trelegy Ellipta Fluticasone/Umeclidin/Vilanter Brand 135 $93,428
Prolia Denosumab Brand 42 $69,930
Tradjenta Linagliptin Brand 95 $63,133
Mounjaro Tirzepatide Brand 44 $54,949
Januvia Sitagliptin Phosphate Brand 63 $50,149

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 212 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 105,120 Part D prescribers listed as Family Practice; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 71 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$99,699

Of which drugs: $291

Medicare patients

331

Average age 79

Services billed

3,064

187 women, 144 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Diabetes 47%
Arthritis 47%
Ischemic heart disease 28%
Chronic kidney disease 28%
Depression 23%
Osteoporosis 23%
Heart failure 22%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, methylprednisolone acetate, 1 mg J1010 Office 22 1,401 $141
Injection, vitamin b-12 cyanocobalamin, up to 1000 mcg J3420 Office 12 27 $26

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 39 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
REXULTI
  • Lundbeck LLC $98
  • Otsuka America Pharmaceutical, Inc. $52
$150 29 —
XARELTO
  • Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc $138
$138 83 —
LEQVIO
  • Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $101
$101 — —
FARXIGA
  • AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $83
$83 111 —
GEMTESA
  • Sumitomo Pharma America, Inc. $80
$80 32 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 39 with Patron

Records

584 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Geriatric Medicine in California

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record