Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

William Summers

Internal Medicine Saint Louis, MO Medical Doctor

NPI 1265471650 CMS profile 798405

3915 Watson Rd Ste 202, Saint Louis, MO 63109

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$92,559

472 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, William Summers of Saint Louis, MO is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $92,559 across 472 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 99th percentile of Internal Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $16,326 102
2024 General $6,125 69
2023 General $16,984 90
2022 General $12,901 33
2021 General $9,245 34
2020 General $8,868 27
2019 General $22,109 117

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • William Summers
  • Internal Medicine median
  • Middle half of Internal Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to William Summers were reported at $16,326. Among 52,115 Internal Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $156 and the middle half received between $47 and $551.

Show as a table
Year William Summers Internal Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $22,109 $159 $48–$570 $163
2020 $8,868 $119 $33–$402 $114
2021 $9,245 $135 $37–$521 $132
2022 $12,901 $141 $42–$496 $149
2023 $16,984 $149 $45–$519 $160
2024 $6,125 $154 $47–$537 $164
2025 $16,326 $156 $47–$551 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Gilead Sciences, Inc. $89,371 253 payments
  2. ViiV Healthcare Company $1,281 102 payments
  3. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $382 22 payments
  4. AbbVie, Inc. $259 23 payments
  5. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $244 17 payments
  6. Novo Nordisk Inc $241 14 payments
  7. Astellas Pharma US Inc $96 4 payments
  8. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $93 4 payments
  9. EMD Serono, Inc. $74 3 payments
  10. Lundbeck LLC $69 3 payments
  11. Other $449 27 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $69,081 39 payments
  2. Travel and Lodging $15,289 41 payments
  3. Food and Beverage $6,868 385 payments
  4. Consulting Fee $1,210 1 payment
  5. Education $111 6 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Biktarvy $42,786 57 payments
  2. Sunlenca $8,233 10 payments
  3. DOVATO $620 49 payments
  4. MAVYRET $244 22 payments
  5. TRELEGY ELLIPTA $217 15 payments
  6. TIVICAY $208 2 payments
  7. FARXIGA $191 11 payments
  8. APRETUDE $178 13 payments
  9. BREZTRI $148 8 payments
  10. CABENUVA $130 9 payments
  11. Other $1,881 120 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 182 drugs

Part D claims

11,450

Median for Internal Medicine: 777

Drug cost

$6,129,342

Median for Internal Medicine: $73,373

Branded share of claims

37.9%

Median for Internal Medicine: 19.3%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Biktarvy Bictegrav/Emtricit/Tenofov Ala Brand 837 $3,299,613
Genvoya Elviteg/Cob/Emtri/Tenof Alafen Brand 91 $388,195
Serostim Somatropin Brand 14 $286,301
Triumeq Abacavir/Dolutegravir/Lamivudi Brand 51 $188,696
Descovy Emtricitabine/Tenofov Alafenam Brand 76 $169,026
Trelegy Ellipta Fluticasone/Umeclidin/Vilanter Brand 208 $145,700
Juluca Dolutegravir/Rilpivirine Brand 40 $143,486
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 130 $142,707
Odefsey Emtricitab/Rilpiviri/Tenof Ala Brand 35 $126,453
Egrifta Sv Tesamorelin Acetate Brand 16 $110,392

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 182 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 104,182 Part D prescribers listed as Internal Medicine; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 40 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$47,303

Of which drugs: $1,532

Medicare patients

127

Average age 64

Services billed

6,330

46 women, 81 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 68%
Depression 51%
Arthritis 39%
Diabetes 27%
COPD 24%
Ischemic heart disease 19%
Chronic kidney disease 15%
Cancer 13%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Vaccine for influenza for administration into muscle, 0.5 ml dosage 90656 Office 27 27 $591

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 17 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
Biktarvy
  • Gilead Sciences, Inc. $3,100
$3,100 837 —
APRETUDE
  • ViiV Healthcare Company $86
$86 — —
BREZTRI
  • AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $83
$83 — —
FARXIGA
  • AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $60
$60 155 —
CABENUVA
  • ViiV Healthcare Company $57
$57 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 17 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

472 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Internal Medicine in Missouri

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record