Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

William Stevenson

Retina Specialist Reno, NV Medical Doctor

NPI 1386084119 CMS profile 459767

610 Sierra Rose Dr, Reno, NV 89511

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$4,791

117 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, William Stevenson of Reno, NV is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $4,791 across 117 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 63rd percentile of Retina Specialist profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $719 22
2024 General $871 27
2023 General $669 23
2022 General $1,462 18
2021 General $548 15
2020 General $70 4
2019 General $451 8

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • William Stevenson
  • Retina Specialist median
  • Middle half of Retina Specialist
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to William Stevenson were reported at $719. Among 1,235 Retina Specialist profiles paid that year, the median was $457 and the middle half received between $175 and $1,079.

Show as a table
Year William Stevenson Retina Specialist median Middle half National median
2019 $451 $410 $157–$1,517 $163
2020 $70 $168 $65–$778 $114
2021 $548 $258 $101–$1,161 $132
2022 $1,462 $418 $162–$1,488 $149
2023 $669 $476 $178–$1,312 $160
2024 $871 $520 $188–$1,372 $164
2025 $719 $457 $175–$1,079 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Alimera Sciences, Inc. $1,548 12 payments
  2. Genentech USA, Inc. $585 17 payments
  3. Regeneron Healthcare Solutions, Inc. $561 20 payments
  4. AbbVie, Inc. $358 14 payments
  5. Apellis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $326 5 payments
  6. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $225 7 payments
  7. ANI Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $160 7 payments
  8. Harrow Eye, LLC $149 2 payments
  9. Astellas Pharma US Inc $144 7 payments
  10. Kala Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $142 2 payments
  11. Other $592 24 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $4,791 117 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. ILUVIEN Ophthalmology $1,367 7 payments
  2. VABYSMO $521 14 payments
  3. EYLEA $357 16 payments
  4. Syfovre $326 5 payments
  5. ILUVIEN treatment of diabetic macular edema in patients who have been previously treated with corticosteroid $226 7 payments
  6. YUTIQ $226 7 payments
  7. EYLEA HD $204 4 payments
  8. OZURDEX Eye Care $192 10 payments
  9. OZURDEX Retina $174 5 payments
  10. IHEEZO $149 2 payments
  11. Other $1,412 47 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 8 drugs

Part D claims

469

Median for Ophthalmology: 891

Drug cost

$10,136

Median for Ophthalmology: $68,233

Branded share of claims

29.4%

Median for Ophthalmology: 29.7%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Prednisolone Acetate Generic 190 $5,241
Moxifloxacin Moxifloxacin Hcl Brand 108 $3,147
Dorzolamide-Timolol Dorzolamide Hcl/Timolol Maleat Brand 30 $554
Dorzolamide Hcl Generic 24 $284
Timolol Maleate Generic 47 $283
Ketorolac Tromethamine Generic 16 $267
Brimonidine Tartrate Generic 23 $197
Latanoprost Generic 31 $164

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 18,260 Part D prescribers listed as Ophthalmology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 48 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$2,769,283

Of which drugs: $2,125,543

Medicare patients

1,196

Average age 77

Services billed

34,779

678 women, 518 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 39%
Diabetes 38%
Ischemic heart disease 28%
Chronic kidney disease 27%
Atrial fibrillation 21%
Depression 20%
Heart failure 16%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, aflibercept, 1 mg J0178 Office 158 1,442 $947,133
Injection, faricimab-svoa, 0.1 mg J2777 Office 98 20,220 $552,837
Injection, aflibercept hd, 1 mg J0177 Office 29 760 $201,418
Injection, avacincaptad pegol, 0.1 mg J2782 Office 30 2,180 $188,164
Injection, pegcetacoplan, intravitreal, 1 mg J2781 Office 12 1,080 $126,315
Injection, ranibizumab, 0.1 mg J2778 Office 41 435 $61,312
Injection, ranibizumab-eqrn (cimerli), biosimilar, 0.1 mg Q5128 Office 22 179 $29,804
Injection, bevacizumab, 10 mg J9035 Office 13 23 $1,321

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 12 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
VABYSMO
  • Genentech USA, Inc. $203
$203 — 20,220
Syfovre
  • Apellis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $150
$150 — 1,080
ILUVIEN
  • Alimera Sciences, Inc. $91
$91 — —
EYLEA
  • Regeneron Healthcare Solutions, Inc. $72
$72 — 1,442
OZURDEX
  • AbbVie, Inc. $61
$61 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 12 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

117 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Retina Specialist in Nevada

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record