Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

William Smith

Cardiovascular Disease Ruston, LA Medical Doctor

NPI 1992776231 CMS profile 391385

1200 S Farmerville St, Ruston, LA 71270

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$7,685

459 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$1,397

Paid to them · 1 record reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$685,850 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2020–2024

Through program year 2025, William Smith of Ruston, LA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $7,685 across 459 general payments and $1,397 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $685,850 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 80th percentile of Cardiovascular Disease profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

8 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $1,523 59
2024 General $889 48
2023 General $922 54
2022 General $1,268 81
2022 Research $1,397 1
2021 General $1,206 80
2020 General $755 57
2019 General $1,122 80

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • William Smith
  • Cardiovascular Disease median
  • Middle half of Cardiovascular Disease
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to William Smith were reported at $1,523. Among 16,617 Cardiovascular Disease profiles paid that year, the median was $432 and the middle half received between $132 and $1,252.

Show as a table
Year William Smith Cardiovascular Disease median Middle half National median
2019 $1,122 $450 $127–$1,392 $163
2020 $755 $242 $77–$751 $114
2021 $1,206 $335 $101–$1,037 $132
2022 $1,268 $395 $121–$1,211 $149
2023 $922 $443 $136–$1,283 $160
2024 $889 $450 $136–$1,323 $164
2025 $1,523 $432 $132–$1,252 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. ZOLL Services LLC (A/K/A ZOLL LifeCor Corp) $985 82 payments
  2. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $786 42 payments
  3. Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC $538 34 payments
  4. Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc $525 48 payments
  5. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation $479 23 payments
  6. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $457 26 payments
  7. E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $450 31 payments
  8. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $438 28 payments
  9. Amgen Inc. $360 22 payments
  10. Pfizer Inc. $343 23 payments
  11. Other $2,325 100 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $7,685 459 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. LifeVest $985 82 payments
  2. FARXIGA $724 38 payments
  3. VERQUVO $591 28 payments
  4. XARELTO $525 48 payments
  5. Repatha $360 22 payments
  6. ELIQUIS Cardiovascular;Metabolic Disease $343 23 payments
  7. JARDIANCE $317 19 payments
  8. ELIQUIS Cardiovascular $300 23 payments
  9. ENTRESTO $254 18 payments
  10. Kerendia $228 16 payments
  11. Other $3,764 178 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Research payments came from Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Eli Lilly and Company $1,397 1 payment

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 81 drugs

Part D claims

9,132

Median for Cardiology: 2,533

Drug cost

$1,408,915

Median for Cardiology: $485,213

Branded share of claims

28.4%

Median for Cardiology: 25.7%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 748 $527,911
Entresto Sacubitril/Valsartan Brand 353 $295,171
Xarelto Rivaroxaban Brand 162 $124,632
Repatha Sureclick Evolocumab Brand 163 $88,591
Multaq Dronedarone Hcl Brand 93 $86,818
Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 111 $85,558
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 100 $65,262
Vascepa Icosapent Ethyl Brand 90 $36,592
Brilinta Ticagrelor Brand 21 $10,920
Repatha Syringe Evolocumab Brand 11 $9,273

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 81 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 18,782 Part D prescribers listed as Cardiology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 56 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$205,746

Of which drugs: $1,214

Medicare patients

959

Average age 76

Services billed

4,494

473 women, 486 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 50%
Ischemic heart disease 48%
Diabetes 46%
Atrial fibrillation 38%
Heart failure 36%
Chronic kidney disease 33%
Depression 27%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, regadenoson, 0.1 mg J2785 Office 54 216 $1,214

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 9 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
FARXIGA
  • AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $138
$138 111 —
VERQUVO
  • Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation $112
$112 — —
ELIQUIS
  • E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $73
  • PFIZER INC. $17
$90 748 —
JARDIANCE
  • Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $81
$81 100 —
LEQVIO
  • Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $56
$56 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 9 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

460 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Cardiovascular Disease in Louisiana

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record