Doctor of Osteopathy Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

William Sargeant

Adult Medicine Montgomery, AL Doctor of Osteopathy

NPI 1235159435 CMS profile 237707

1758 Park Place, Suite 100, Montgomery, AL 36106

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$6,158

365 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$50

Paid to them · 1 record reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$1,034,202 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2019–2025

Through program year 2025, William Sargeant of Montgomery, AL is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $6,158 across 365 general payments and $50 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $1,034,202 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 91st percentile of Adult Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

8 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $305 14
2024 General $831 45
2023 General $1,175 50
2022 General $716 41
2022 Research $50 1
2021 General $934 61
2020 General $1,309 91
2019 General $888 63

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • William Sargeant
  • Adult Medicine median
  • Middle half of Adult Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to William Sargeant were reported at $305. Among 691 Adult Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $151 and the middle half received between $51 and $528.

Show as a table
Year William Sargeant Adult Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $888 $140 $41–$517 $163
2020 $1,309 $107 $25–$378 $114
2021 $934 $136 $32–$529 $132
2022 $716 $138 $39–$492 $149
2023 $1,175 $155 $46–$483 $160
2024 $831 $153 $46–$554 $164
2025 $305 $151 $51–$528 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $1,474 82 payments
  2. Amarin Pharma Inc. $608 37 payments
  3. Novo Nordisk Inc $520 31 payments
  4. Amgen Inc. $414 25 payments
  5. Astellas Pharma US Inc $377 20 payments
  6. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $336 19 payments
  7. Pfizer Inc. $292 19 payments
  8. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc. $263 15 payments
  9. Lilly USA, LLC $237 19 payments
  10. Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc $211 16 payments
  11. Other $1,426 82 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $6,058 364 payments
  2. Education $100 1 payment
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. TRELEGY ELLIPTA $986 64 payments
  2. Ozempic $491 29 payments
  3. Vascepa $478 29 payments
  4. RYBELSUS $402 23 payments
  5. Kerendia $263 15 payments
  6. SHINGRIX $234 7 payments
  7. MYRBETRIQ $227 16 payments
  8. Repatha $225 13 payments
  9. XARELTO $211 16 payments
  10. ELIQUIS $210 13 payments
  11. Other $3,648 223 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Research payments came from Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Novo Nordisk AS $50 1 payment

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 181 drugs

Part D claims

15,549

Median for Family Practice: 1,826

Drug cost

$2,211,170

Median for Family Practice: $120,094

Branded share of claims

26.1%

Median for Family Practice: 18.9%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 236 $268,783
Mounjaro Tirzepatide Brand 205 $226,822
Trelegy Ellipta Fluticasone/Umeclidin/Vilanter Brand 248 $193,244
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 104 $139,939
Linzess Linaclotide Brand 124 $125,705
Entresto Sacubitril/Valsartan Brand 108 $121,482
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 108 $118,342
Januvia Sitagliptin Phosphate Brand 103 $100,913
Gemtesa Vibegron Brand 108 $91,720
Trulicity Dulaglutide Brand 89 $88,376

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 181 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 105,120 Part D prescribers listed as Family Practice; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 50 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$31,328

Of which drugs: $298

Medicare patients

54

Average age 77

Services billed

2,545

24 women, 30 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Chronic kidney disease 70%
Arthritis 56%
Diabetes 41%
Ischemic heart disease 33%
COPD 26%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, methylprednisolone acetate, 1 mg J1010 Office 19 1,774 $181
Injection, ketorolac tromethamine, per 15 mg J1885 Office 17 100 $54

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 23 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
TRELEGY ELLIPTA
  • GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $180
$180 248 —
GEMTESA
  • Sumitomo Pharma America, Inc. $93
$93 108 —
Kerendia
  • Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc. $91
$91 — —
VOQUEZNA
  • Phathom Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $67
$67 — —
KRYSTEXXA
  • Amgen Inc. $52
$52 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 23 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

366 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Adult Medicine in Alabama

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record