Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

William Priester

Ophthalmology Jackson, TN Medical Doctor

NPI 1093710857 CMS profile 321064

609 Skyline Dr, Jackson, TN 38301

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$3,163

136 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, William Priester of Jackson, TN is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $3,163 across 136 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 70th percentile of Ophthalmology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $767 22
2024 General $566 23
2023 General $532 24
2022 General $212 13
2021 General $282 16
2020 General $297 16
2019 General $508 22

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • William Priester
  • Ophthalmology median
  • Middle half of Ophthalmology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to William Priester were reported at $767. Among 13,034 Ophthalmology profiles paid that year, the median was $384 and the middle half received between $136 and $917.

Show as a table
Year William Priester Ophthalmology median Middle half National median
2019 $508 $258 $104–$655 $163
2020 $297 $126 $45–$321 $114
2021 $282 $205 $76–$534 $132
2022 $212 $266 $100–$678 $149
2023 $532 $308 $117–$745 $160
2024 $566 $340 $127–$846 $164
2025 $767 $384 $136–$917 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Apellis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $729 29 payments
  2. Genentech USA, Inc. $497 18 payments
  3. Allergan Inc. $413 21 payments
  4. Alimera Sciences, Inc. $332 16 payments
  5. Regeneron Healthcare Solutions, Inc. $331 16 payments
  6. Astellas Pharma US Inc $244 6 payments
  7. AbbVie, Inc. $196 11 payments
  8. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $184 6 payments
  9. Kowa Pharmaceuticals America, Inc. $72 4 payments
  10. ANI Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $67 3 payments
  11. Other $97 6 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $3,163 136 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Syfovre $679 26 payments
  2. VABYSMO $410 12 payments
  3. OZURDEX Retina $339 23 payments
  4. ILUVIEN $288 14 payments
  5. EYLEA $243 12 payments
  6. Izervay $225 5 payments
  7. EYLEA HD $159 6 payments
  8. OZURDEX Eye Care $156 8 payments
  9. XEN $114 1 payment
  10. Lucentis $101 7 payments
  11. Other $405 22 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 16 drugs

Part D claims

793

Median for Ophthalmology: 891

Drug cost

$33,368

Median for Ophthalmology: $68,233

Branded share of claims

25.5%

Median for Ophthalmology: 29.7%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Prolensa Bromfenac Sodium Brand 32 $13,130
Ketorolac Tromethamine Generic 225 $4,177
Difluprednate Generic 41 $3,562
Prednisolone Acetate Generic 115 $3,230
Loteprednol Etabonate Generic 21 $2,660
Bromfenac Sodium Generic 14 $2,083
Neomycin-Polymyxin-Dexameth Neomycin/Polymyxin B/Dexametha Brand 115 $1,329
Brimonidine Tartrate Generic 26 $1,104
Moxifloxacin Moxifloxacin Hcl Brand 21 $427
Latanoprost Generic 40 $359

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 16 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 18,260 Part D prescribers listed as Ophthalmology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 35 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$4,359,795

Of which drugs: $3,765,812

Medicare patients

1,115

Average age 77

Services billed

42,495

645 women, 470 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 49%
Diabetes 48%
Ischemic heart disease 37%
Chronic kidney disease 32%
Heart failure 23%
Depression 22%
Atrial fibrillation 21%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, ranibizumab-eqrn (cimerli), biosimilar, 0.1 mg Q5128 Office 385 10,650 $1,930,543
Injection, aflibercept, 1 mg J0178 Office 146 1,764 $1,155,511
Injection, faricimab-svoa, 0.1 mg J2777 Office 59 19,380 $529,405
Injection, ranibizumab, 0.1 mg J2778 Office 27 803 $96,980
Injection, bevacizumab, 10 mg J9035 Office 88 461 $25,838

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 7 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
VABYSMO
  • Genentech USA, Inc. $172
$172 — 19,380
Syfovre
  • Apellis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $164
$164 — —
OZURDEX
  • AbbVie, Inc. $64
$64 — —
EYLEA HD
  • Regeneron Healthcare Solutions, Inc. $59
$59 — —
Izervay
  • Astellas Pharma US Inc $44
$44 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 7 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

136 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Ophthalmology in Tennessee

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record