Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

William Blythe

Otolaryngology Opelika, AL Medical Doctor

NPI 1851321053 CMS profile 174511

1965 1St Ave, Opelika, AL 36801

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$18,901

144 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$86,805

Paid to them · 17 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$25,750 paid to institutions, not to them · program year 2025

Through program year 2025, William Blythe of Opelika, AL is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $18,901 across 144 general payments and $86,805 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $25,750 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 98th percentile of Otolaryngology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

9 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $1,397 28
2025 Research $59,904 13
2024 General $1,748 34
2024 Research $26,901 4
2023 General $1,384 32
2022 General $1,473 20
2021 General $10,031 9
2020 General $85 5
2019 General $2,783 16

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • William Blythe
  • Otolaryngology median
  • Middle half of Otolaryngology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to William Blythe were reported at $1,397. Among 6,588 Otolaryngology profiles paid that year, the median was $317 and the middle half received between $125 and $815.

Show as a table
Year William Blythe Otolaryngology median Middle half National median
2019 $2,783 $194 $82–$512 $163
2020 $85 $118 $42–$280 $114
2021 $10,031 $167 $63–$444 $132
2022 $1,473 $216 $84–$545 $149
2023 $1,384 $235 $93–$588 $160
2024 $1,748 $280 $111–$699 $164
2025 $1,397 $317 $125–$815 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Inspire Medical Systems, Inc. $13,894 48 payments
  2. Cochlear Americas $2,342 11 payments
  3. Genzyme Corporation $451 13 payments
  4. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $375 21 payments
  5. Advanced Bionics, LLC $303 4 payments
  6. Neurent Medical Limited $300 4 payments
  7. Aerin Medical Inc. $273 6 payments
  8. Regeneron Healthcare Solutions, Inc. $231 10 payments
  9. Phathom Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $145 3 payments
  10. Stryker Corporation $118 6 payments
  11. Other $469 18 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Consulting Fee $10,125 2 payments
  2. Food and Beverage $7,168 133 payments
  3. Travel and Lodging $1,608 9 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Inspire Upper Airway Stimulation System $11,148 7 payments
  2. INSPIRE $2,746 41 payments
  3. Nucleus $2,164 7 payments
  4. Baha $2,164 7 payments
  5. DUPIXENT $624 16 payments
  6. NUCALA $375 21 payments
  7. NEUROMARK Radiofrequency Console $300 4 payments
  8. NEUROMARK Device $276 3 payments
  9. HIRES ULTRA CI HIFOCUS MS ELECTRODE $243 3 payments
  10. RHINAER STYLUS $216 3 payments
  11. Other $2,192 68 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Research payments came from Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Neurent Medical Limited $86,805 17 payments

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 21 drugs

Part D claims

1,287

Median for Otolaryngology: 297

Drug cost

$71,216

Median for Otolaryngology: $6,314

Branded share of claims

8.8%

Median for Otolaryngology: 10.3%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Dupixent Pen Dupilumab Brand 13 $48,077
Azelastine Hcl Generic 170 $5,534
Fluticasone Propionate Generic 191 $2,931
Levothyroxine Sodium Generic 157 $2,125
Fluocinolone Acetonide Oil Generic 38 $2,048
Pantoprazole Sodium Generic 129 $1,603
Ipratropium Bromide Generic 38 $1,467
Ofloxacin Generic 32 $1,284
Montelukast Sodium Generic 56 $1,257
Levocetirizine Dihydrochloride Generic 103 $1,220

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 21 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 9,296 Part D prescribers listed as Otolaryngology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 77 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$119,267

Medicare's payments for the services billed

Medicare patients

440

Average age 74

Services billed

2,815

267 women, 173 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 54%
Ischemic heart disease 35%
Diabetes 31%
Chronic kidney disease 22%
Depression 21%
Atrial fibrillation 20%
COPD 18%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

4 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
DUPIXENT
  • GENZYME CORPORATION $133
  • Regeneron Healthcare Solutions, Inc. $59
$192 13 —
NUCALA
  • GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $104
$104 — —
LIBTAYO
  • Regeneron Healthcare Solutions, Inc. $29
$29 — —
VOQUEZNA
  • Phathom Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $15
$15 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

Records

161 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record