Nurse Practitioner Program year 2025 Reported 2021–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Whitney Feichtner

Nurse Practitioner, Family Chesterfield, MO Nurse Practitioner

NPI 1891203865 CMS profile 10832093

1176 Town And Country Commons Dr, Chesterfield, MO 63017

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$29,456

1,128 records reported · program years 2021–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2021–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Whitney Feichtner of Chesterfield, MO is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $29,456 across 1,128 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 99th percentile of Nurse Practitioner, Family profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

5 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $13,947 271
2024 General $5,190 268
2023 General $3,875 233
2022 General $3,694 194
2021 General $2,749 162

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Whitney Feichtner
  • Nurse Practitioner, Family median
  • Middle half of Nurse Practitioner, Family
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Whitney Feichtner were reported at $13,947. Among 107,232 Nurse Practitioner, Family profiles paid that year, the median was $168 and the middle half received between $53 and $521.

Show as a table
Year Whitney Feichtner Nurse Practitioner, Family median Middle half National median
2019 $0 $39 $18–$91 $163
2020 $0 $32 $17–$76 $114
2021 $2,749 $124 $35–$379 $132
2022 $3,694 $141 $44–$430 $149
2023 $3,875 $154 $49–$476 $160
2024 $5,190 $165 $51–$504 $164
2025 $13,947 $168 $53–$521 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. Pfizer Inc. $10,786 210 payments
  2. AbbVie, Inc. $6,226 331 payments
  3. Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $884 17 payments
  4. UCB, Inc. $877 40 payments
  5. Biogen, Inc. $611 21 payments
  6. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $559 34 payments
  7. Amgen Inc. $553 32 payments
  8. Lundbeck LLC $552 22 payments
  9. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. $536 25 payments
  10. Lilly USA, LLC $461 23 payments
  11. Other $7,411 373 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $19,788 1,115 payments
  2. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $8,450 5 payments
  3. Consulting Fee $825 2 payments
  4. Education $260 4 payments
  5. Travel and Lodging $133 2 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. NURTEC ODT Pain $10,786 210 payments
  2. QULIPTA $3,634 181 payments
  3. UBRELVY $2,918 155 payments
  4. ZAVZPRET $1,324 178 payments
  5. BOTOX Botox Therapeutic $830 64 payments
  6. NURTEC ODT Primary Care $664 49 payments
  7. Qelbree $639 3 payments
  8. AIMOVIG $517 30 payments
  9. BOTOX Neuroscience $475 7 payments
  10. VYEPTI $439 15 payments
  11. Other $10,609 569 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 30 drugs

Part D claims

1,082

Median for Nurse Practitioner: 389

Drug cost

$312,732

Median for Nurse Practitioner: $21,885

Branded share of claims

43.3%

Median for Nurse Practitioner: 19.6%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Ubrelvy Ubrogepant Brand 56 $79,510
Nurtec Odt Rimegepant Sulfate Brand 45 $70,238
Aimovig Autoinjector Erenumab-Aooe Brand 71 $58,237
Emgality Pen Galcanezumab-Gnlm Brand 59 $43,195
Qulipta Atogepant Brand 33 $37,543
Namzaric Memantine Hcl/Donepezil Hcl Brand 17 $10,821
Memantine Hcl Er Memantine Hcl Brand 17 $2,424
Gabapentin Generic 133 $1,783
Rizatriptan Rizatriptan Benzoate Brand 52 $1,182
Memantine Hcl Generic 57 $1,103

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 30 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 229,976 Part D prescribers listed as Nurse Practitioner; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 14 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$187,237

Of which drugs: $158,856

Medicare patients

206

Average age 72

Services billed

34,007

147 women, 59 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 71%
Arthritis 61%
Depression 36%
Ischemic heart disease 31%
Atrial fibrillation 19%
Chronic kidney disease 18%
Osteoporosis 18%
Diabetes 17%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, onabotulinumtoxina, 1 unit J0585 Office 60 33,600 $158,854

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 44 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
QULIPTA
$662 33 —
Qelbree
$639 — —
UBRELVY
$546 56 —
BOTOX
$371 — 33,600
NURTEC ODT
$352 45 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 44 with Patron

Records

1,128 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Nurse Practitioner, Family in Missouri

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record