Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Wasim Chughtai

Internal Medicine Lincoln, NE Medical Doctor

NPI 1154486306 CMS profile 97967

6900 Van Dorn St, Suite 24, Lincoln, NE 68506

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$6,368

388 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Wasim Chughtai of Lincoln, NE is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $6,368 across 388 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 91st percentile of Internal Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $1,269 67
2024 General $1,295 67
2023 General $1,021 51
2022 General $583 36
2021 General $377 29
2020 General $376 25
2019 General $1,447 113

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Wasim Chughtai
  • Internal Medicine median
  • Middle half of Internal Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Wasim Chughtai were reported at $1,269. Among 52,115 Internal Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $156 and the middle half received between $47 and $551.

Show as a table
Year Wasim Chughtai Internal Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $1,447 $159 $48–$570 $163
2020 $376 $119 $33–$402 $114
2021 $377 $135 $37–$521 $132
2022 $583 $141 $42–$496 $149
2023 $1,021 $149 $45–$519 $160
2024 $1,295 $154 $47–$537 $164
2025 $1,269 $156 $47–$551 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $1,435 81 payments
  2. Novo Nordisk Inc $733 46 payments
  3. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $521 22 payments
  4. Lilly USA, LLC $416 30 payments
  5. Astellas Pharma US Inc $343 14 payments
  6. Amgen Inc. $320 22 payments
  7. Pfizer Inc. $296 26 payments
  8. Amarin Pharma Inc. $193 10 payments
  9. Allergan Inc. $193 18 payments
  10. Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC $154 11 payments
  11. Other $1,764 108 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $6,190 381 payments
  2. Education $178 7 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. QULIPTA $830 37 payments
  2. UBRELVY $463 32 payments
  3. Ozempic $372 22 payments
  4. AIRSUPRA $347 9 payments
  5. FARXIGA $323 8 payments
  6. BREZTRI $279 5 payments
  7. RYBELSUS $267 15 payments
  8. Wegovy $241 15 payments
  9. MOUNJARO $205 16 payments
  10. Repatha $200 13 payments
  11. Other $5,185 351 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 127 drugs

Part D claims

7,647

Median for Internal Medicine: 777

Drug cost

$731,297

Median for Internal Medicine: $73,373

Branded share of claims

19.8%

Median for Internal Medicine: 19.3%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 142 $155,173
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 142 $150,630
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 78 $47,866
Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 51 $41,394
Mounjaro Tirzepatide Brand 39 $40,952
Xarelto Rivaroxaban Brand 49 $35,460
Anoro Ellipta Umeclidinium Brm/Vilanterol Tr Brand 51 $27,445
Trulicity Dulaglutide Brand 18 $19,550
Tresiba Flextouch U-200 Insulin Degludec Brand 23 $18,546
Januvia Sitagliptin Phosphate Brand 17 $18,488

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 127 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 104,182 Part D prescribers listed as Internal Medicine; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 65 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$88,480

Of which drugs: $6,294

Medicare patients

618

Average age 74

Services billed

2,925

325 women, 293 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 63%
Diabetes 24%
Chronic kidney disease 23%
Ischemic heart disease 21%
Heart failure 19%
Depression 19%
Atrial fibrillation 15%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Vaccine for influenza for injection into muscle 90662 Office 43 46 $3,554

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 24 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
QULIPTA
  • AbbVie, Inc. $216
$216 — —
Wegovy
  • Novo Nordisk Inc $89
$89 — —
UBRELVY
  • AbbVie, Inc. $84
$84 — —
FARXIGA
  • AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $81
$81 51 —
MOUNJARO
  • Lilly USA, LLC $78
$78 39 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 24 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

388 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Internal Medicine in Nebraska

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record