Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Wambui MacHua

Rheumatology Atlanta, GA Medical Doctor

NPI 1144541079 CMS profile 1362330

77 Collier Rd Nw, Suite 2080, Atlanta, GA 30309

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$31,182

449 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$1,948

Paid to them · 13 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$1,740,685 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2019–2025

Through program year 2025, Wambui MacHua of Atlanta, GA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $31,182 across 449 general payments and $1,948 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $1,740,685 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 87th percentile of Rheumatology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

9 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $12,165 87
2024 General $7,389 88
2023 General $7,481 94
2022 General $1,552 50
2021 General $795 43
2020 General $918 45
2020 Research $276 1
2019 General $882 42
2019 Research $1,673 12

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Wambui MacHua
  • Rheumatology median
  • Middle half of Rheumatology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Wambui MacHua were reported at $12,165. Among 4,454 Rheumatology profiles paid that year, the median was $903 and the middle half received between $171 and $2,775.

Show as a table
Year Wambui MacHua Rheumatology median Middle half National median
2019 $882 $744 $153–$2,687 $163
2020 $918 $462 $98–$2,027 $114
2021 $795 $531 $101–$2,153 $132
2022 $1,552 $627 $125–$2,303 $149
2023 $7,481 $741 $145–$2,524 $160
2024 $7,389 $830 $166–$2,660 $164
2025 $12,165 $903 $171–$2,775 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $12,360 48 payments
  2. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $4,398 34 payments
  3. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $4,318 24 payments
  4. UCB, Inc. $2,382 36 payments
  5. AbbVie, Inc. $2,032 89 payments
  6. Amgen Inc. $1,208 44 payments
  7. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $945 46 payments
  8. Pfizer Inc. $499 27 payments
  9. Horizon Therapeutics plc $476 30 payments
  10. Aurinia Pharma U.S., Inc. $461 6 payments
  11. Other $2,103 65 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Consulting Fee $13,170 7 payments
  2. Food and Beverage $12,212 419 payments
  3. Travel and Lodging $5,540 17 payments
  4. Education $260 6 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. BENLYSTA $8,710 28 payments
  2. TREMFYA $4,477 26 payments
  3. SAPHNELO $4,185 22 payments
  4. RINVOQ $1,290 53 payments
  5. COSENTYX Dermatology $512 25 payments
  6. SIMPONI ARIA $511 14 payments
  7. Cimzia $499 18 payments
  8. LUPKYNIS $461 6 payments
  9. COSENTYX Immunology $434 21 payments
  10. STELARA $373 9 payments
  11. Other $5,721 268 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Research payments came from Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $1,673 12 payments
  2. Eli Lilly and Company $276 1 payment

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 15 drugs

Part D claims

675

Median for Rheumatology: 1,511

Drug cost

$404,746

Median for Rheumatology: $1,139,948

Branded share of claims

27.3%

Median for Rheumatology: 28.8%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Humira(Cf) Pen Adalimumab Brand 26 $178,479
Enbrel Sureclick Etanercept Brand 24 $172,832
Mycophenolate Mofetil Generic 38 $22,382
Rasuvo Methotrexate/Pf Brand 29 $15,967
Hydroxychloroquine Sulfate Generic 190 $8,312
Leflunomide Generic 46 $2,526
Methotrexate Methotrexate Sodium Brand 90 $2,017
Prednisone Generic 79 $549
Azathioprine Generic 16 $418
Allopurinol Generic 56 $399

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 15 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 5,224 Part D prescribers listed as Rheumatology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 18 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$44,002

Of which drugs: $24,528

Medicare patients

106

Average age 70

Services billed

1,540

91 women, 15 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 71%
Chronic kidney disease 33%
Diabetes 27%
Ischemic heart disease 25%
Osteoporosis 24%
Heart failure 22%
Depression 22%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, denosumab, 1 mg J0897 Office 12 1,200 $24,523

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 26 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
BENLYSTA
  • GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $4,677
$4,677 — —
LUPKYNIS
  • Aurinia Pharma U.S., Inc. $378
$378 — —
RINVOQ
  • AbbVie, Inc. $240
$240 — —
TREMFYA
  • Janssen Biotech, Inc. $228
$228 — —
COSENTYX
  • Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $186
$186 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 26 with Patron

Records

462 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Rheumatology in Georgia

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record