Doctor of Osteopathy Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Walid Mangal

Retina Specialist Stuart, FL Doctor of Osteopathy

NPI 1659529055 CMS profile 980337

1050 Se Monterey Road, Suite #104, Florida Vision Institute Inc., Stuart, FL 34994

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$8,718

113 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$50,000

2 holdings reported · through program year 2025

Through program year 2025, Walid Mangal of Stuart, FL is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $8,718 across 113 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them. They also declared ownership or investment interests valued at $50,000 across 2 holdings.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 73rd percentile of Retina Specialist profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

9 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $462 14
2024 General $728 20
2023 General $566 15
2022 General $901 18
2021 General $474 11
2020 General $2,097 10
2019 General $3,491 25
2020 Ownership $25,000 1
2019 Ownership $25,000 1

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Walid Mangal
  • Retina Specialist median
  • Middle half of Retina Specialist
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Walid Mangal were reported at $462. Among 1,235 Retina Specialist profiles paid that year, the median was $457 and the middle half received between $175 and $1,079.

Show as a table
Year Walid Mangal Retina Specialist median Middle half National median
2019 $3,491 $410 $157–$1,517 $163
2020 $2,097 $168 $65–$778 $114
2021 $474 $258 $101–$1,161 $132
2022 $901 $418 $162–$1,488 $149
2023 $566 $476 $178–$1,312 $160
2024 $728 $520 $188–$1,372 $164
2025 $462 $457 $175–$1,079 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Carl Zeiss Meditec, Inc. $3,935 2 payments
  2. Regeneron Healthcare Solutions, Inc. $761 23 payments
  3. Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Inc. $662 9 payments
  4. Kala Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $525 6 payments
  5. Astellas Pharma US Inc $433 11 payments
  6. Allergan Inc. $327 8 payments
  7. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $289 11 payments
  8. Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. $268 2 payments
  9. Genentech USA, Inc. $267 14 payments
  10. Apellis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $256 8 payments
  11. Other $995 19 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $4,784 111 payments
  2. Gift $3,935 2 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. CLARUS 500 Fundus Camera $2,133 1 payment
  2. CLARUS $1,802 1 payment
  3. EYLEA $715 21 payments
  4. BromSite $536 6 payments
  5. INVELTYS $525 6 payments
  6. EYLEA HD $276 6 payments
  7. Tecnis IOL $268 2 payments
  8. Izervay $232 8 payments
  9. VABYSMO $222 12 payments
  10. OZURDEX $192 5 payments
  11. Other $2,095 47 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 14 drugs

Part D claims

1,523

Median for Ophthalmology: 891

Drug cost

$2,912,905

Median for Ophthalmology: $68,233

Branded share of claims

76.6%

Median for Ophthalmology: 29.7%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Vabysmo Faricimab-Svoa Brand 534 $1,439,167
Eylea Aflibercept Brand 493 $1,116,502
Eylea Hd Aflibercept Brand 74 $249,767
Ozurdex Dexamethasone Brand 36 $56,293
Beovu Brolucizumab-Dbll Brand 17 $38,664
Prednisolone Acetate Generic 135 $5,272
Combigan Brimonidine Tartrate/Timolol Brand 12 $2,706
Difluprednate Generic 19 $2,363
Ofloxacin Generic 35 $508
Ketorolac Tromethamine Generic 16 $442

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 14 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 18,260 Part D prescribers listed as Ophthalmology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 32 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$2,485,500

Of which drugs: $1,526,984

Medicare patients

1,632

Average age 77

Services billed

45,613

885 women, 747 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 48%
Diabetes 33%
Ischemic heart disease 33%
Chronic kidney disease 28%
Atrial fibrillation 20%
Cancer 19%
Depression 19%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, faricimab-svoa, 0.1 mg J2777 Office 108 32,820 $904,050
Injection, aflibercept, 1 mg J0178 Office 103 736 $485,021
Injection, aflibercept hd, 1 mg J0177 Office 14 368 $97,349

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 8 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
EYLEA HD
  • Regeneron Healthcare Solutions, Inc. $115
$115 74 368
EYLEA
  • Regeneron Healthcare Solutions, Inc. $115
$115 567 736
IHEEZO
  • Harrow Eye, LLC $105
$105 — —
Izervay
  • Astellas Pharma US Inc $105
$105 — —
VABYSMO
  • Genentech USA, Inc. $54
$54 534 32,820

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 8 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

113 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Retina Specialist in Florida

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record