Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Virginia Blalack

Internal Medicine Gulfport, MS Medical Doctor

NPI 1295965614 CMS profile 285968

1340 Broad Ave Ste 310, Gulfport, MS 39501

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$5,186

372 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Virginia Blalack of Gulfport, MS is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $5,186 across 372 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 89th percentile of Internal Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

6 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $14 1
2023 General $73 4
2022 General $851 57
2021 General $1,743 121
2020 General $1,155 82
2019 General $1,351 107

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Virginia Blalack
  • Internal Medicine median
  • Middle half of Internal Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Virginia Blalack were reported at $14. Among 52,115 Internal Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $156 and the middle half received between $47 and $551.

Show as a table
Year Virginia Blalack Internal Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $1,351 $159 $48–$570 $163
2020 $1,155 $119 $33–$402 $114
2021 $1,743 $135 $37–$521 $132
2022 $851 $141 $42–$496 $149
2023 $73 $149 $45–$519 $160
2024 $0 $154 $47–$537 $164
2025 $14 $156 $47–$551 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Novo Nordisk Inc $859 63 payments
  2. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $589 42 payments
  3. Amgen Inc. $577 45 payments
  4. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $495 30 payments
  5. Pfizer Inc. $427 39 payments
  6. Astellas Pharma US Inc $357 24 payments
  7. AbbVie, Inc. $253 20 payments
  8. Lilly USA, LLC $228 14 payments
  9. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $183 15 payments
  10. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation $167 10 payments
  11. Other $1,051 70 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $5,178 370 payments
  2. Education $8 2 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Ozempic $812 59 payments
  2. TRELEGY ELLIPTA $503 35 payments
  3. Repatha $371 29 payments
  4. MYRBETRIQ $357 24 payments
  5. FARXIGA $346 19 payments
  6. AIMOVIG $338 27 payments
  7. ELIQUIS $244 16 payments
  8. Otezla $243 19 payments
  9. RYBELSUS $216 20 payments
  10. TRULICITY $212 13 payments
  11. Other $4,006 287 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Records

372 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Internal Medicine in Mississippi

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record