Doctor of Osteopathy Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Vinita Patel

Rheumatology Bronx, NY Doctor of Osteopathy

NPI 1154594646 CMS profile 98323

3184 Grand Concourse, 2A, Bronx, NY 10458

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$73,018

566 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Vinita Patel of Bronx, NY is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $73,018 across 566 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 91st percentile of Rheumatology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $3,068 56
2024 General $2,543 60
2023 General $2,471 82
2022 General $2,741 110
2021 General $3,947 69
2020 General $22,158 43
2019 General $36,089 146

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Vinita Patel
  • Rheumatology median
  • Middle half of Rheumatology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Vinita Patel were reported at $3,068. Among 4,454 Rheumatology profiles paid that year, the median was $903 and the middle half received between $171 and $2,775.

Show as a table
Year Vinita Patel Rheumatology median Middle half National median
2019 $36,089 $744 $153–$2,687 $163
2020 $22,158 $462 $98–$2,027 $114
2021 $3,947 $531 $101–$2,153 $132
2022 $2,741 $627 $125–$2,303 $149
2023 $2,471 $741 $145–$2,524 $160
2024 $2,543 $830 $166–$2,660 $164
2025 $3,068 $903 $171–$2,775 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $23,944 196 payments
  2. Horizon Therapeutics plc $16,364 95 payments
  3. Celgene Corporation $13,899 39 payments
  4. Amgen Inc. $11,907 25 payments
  5. UCB, Inc. $1,391 2 payments
  6. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $1,324 98 payments
  7. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $1,127 31 payments
  8. Pfizer Inc. $860 44 payments
  9. Regeneron Healthcare Solutions, Inc. $493 4 payments
  10. Mallinckrodt Hospital Products Inc. $369 4 payments
  11. Other $1,339 28 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $32,071 21 payments
  2. Food and Beverage $19,004 492 payments
  3. Honoraria $14,000 9 payments
  4. Consulting Fee $5,813 2 payments
  5. Travel and Lodging $1,625 12 payments
  6. Education $506 30 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. HUMIRA $14,310 30 payments
  2. Otezla Dermatology $13,839 24 payments
  3. RAYOS Rayos $13,761 15 payments
  4. RAYOS Rayos $13,761 15 payments
  5. RAYOS Rayos $13,761 15 payments
  6. Otezla Inflammation $11,522 19 payments
  7. RINVOQ $5,456 105 payments
  8. KRYSTEXXA $2,395 51 payments
  9. SKYRIZI $1,381 33 payments
  10. SIMPONI ARIA $955 26 payments
  11. Other $7,585 282 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 24 drugs

Part D claims

1,340

Median for Rheumatology: 1,511

Drug cost

$439,258

Median for Rheumatology: $1,139,948

Branded share of claims

15.6%

Median for Rheumatology: 28.8%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Humira(Cf) Pen Adalimumab Brand 27 $214,843
Teriparatide Generic 16 $63,123
Rayos Prednisone Brand 14 $54,518
Prolia Denosumab Brand 31 $53,382
Actemra Tocilizumab Brand 11 $26,359
Febuxostat Generic 57 $7,777
Hydroxychloroquine Sulfate Generic 134 $3,332
Leflunomide Generic 37 $2,709
Colchicine Generic 48 $2,563
Methotrexate Methotrexate Sodium Brand 126 $2,278

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 24 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 5,224 Part D prescribers listed as Rheumatology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 67 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$251,131

Of which drugs: $152,851

Medicare patients

323

Average age 75

Services billed

15,697

240 women, 83 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 73%
Osteoporosis 40%
Diabetes 28%
Ischemic heart disease 22%
Depression 16%
Chronic kidney disease 15%
Cancer 15%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, denosumab, 1 mg J0897 Office 55 5,100 $101,135
Hyaluronan or derivative, euflexxa, for intra-articular injection, per dose J7323 Office 14 57 $5,402
Injection, methylprednisolone acetate, 1 mg J1010 Office 18 783 $81

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 13 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
RINVOQ
  • AbbVie, Inc. $959
$959 — —
SKYRIZI
  • AbbVie, Inc. $708
$708 — —
XELJANZ
  • PFIZER INC. $153
$153 — —
ACTHAR
  • Mallinckrodt Hospital Products Inc. $150
$150 — —
EVENITY
  • Amgen Inc. $125
$125 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 13 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

566 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Rheumatology in New York

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record