Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Vincent Lee

Family Medicine Paragould, AR Medical Doctor

NPI 1639498462 CMS profile 780315

3501 Carriage Hill Dr Ste B, Paragould, AR 72450

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$15,862

973 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Vincent Lee of Paragould, AR is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $15,862 across 973 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 97th percentile of Family Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $2,518 135
2024 General $2,011 122
2023 General $2,320 143
2022 General $2,387 153
2021 General $2,697 166
2020 General $2,027 138
2019 General $1,902 116

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Vincent Lee
  • Family Medicine median
  • Middle half of Family Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Vincent Lee were reported at $2,518. Among 56,786 Family Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $155 and the middle half received between $45 and $549.

Show as a table
Year Vincent Lee Family Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $1,902 $150 $41–$543 $163
2020 $2,027 $120 $32–$415 $114
2021 $2,697 $137 $35–$551 $132
2022 $2,387 $137 $37–$512 $149
2023 $2,320 $149 $42–$545 $160
2024 $2,011 $156 $44–$560 $164
2025 $2,518 $155 $45–$549 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $3,273 129 payments
  2. Novo Nordisk Inc $2,665 170 payments
  3. Amgen Inc. $1,241 97 payments
  4. AbbVie, Inc. $1,182 89 payments
  5. Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc. $1,034 63 payments
  6. Pfizer Inc. $823 58 payments
  7. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $706 47 payments
  8. Salix Pharmaceuticals, a division of Bausch Health US, LLC $443 31 payments
  9. Biohaven Pharmaceutical Holding Company Ltd. $373 17 payments
  10. Astellas Pharma US Inc $371 21 payments
  11. Other $3,751 251 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $15,765 970 payments
  2. Education $97 3 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. FARXIGA $2,232 83 payments
  2. Ozempic $1,549 81 payments
  3. RYBELSUS $1,073 68 payments
  4. BREZTRI $1,021 19 payments
  5. TRINTELLIX $913 53 payments
  6. AIRSUPRA $843 23 payments
  7. NURTEC ODT Pain $742 53 payments
  8. NURTEC ODT Primary Care $653 31 payments
  9. Repatha $533 45 payments
  10. ZAVZPRET $531 45 payments
  11. Other $10,950 804 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 119 drugs

Part D claims

4,831

Median for Family Practice: 1,826

Drug cost

$500,829

Median for Family Practice: $120,094

Branded share of claims

28.1%

Median for Family Practice: 18.9%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 73 $88,775
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 69 $61,701
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 62 $53,639
Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 51 $51,267
Trelegy Ellipta Fluticasone/Umeclidin/Vilanter Brand 47 $46,730
Xarelto Rivaroxaban Brand 21 $20,808
Januvia Sitagliptin Phosphate Brand 29 $20,033
Tresiba Flextouch U-200 Insulin Degludec Brand 18 $17,527
Myrbetriq Mirabegron Brand 28 $17,516
Nurtec Odt Rimegepant Sulfate Brand 11 $16,766

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 119 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 105,120 Part D prescribers listed as Family Practice; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 52 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$63,273

Of which drugs: $6,302

Medicare patients

97

Average age 69

Services billed

1,325

59 women, 38 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 54%
Diabetes 44%
Depression 25%
COPD 21%
Ischemic heart disease 19%
Chronic kidney disease 19%
Heart failure 13%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Vaccine for influenza for injection into muscle 90653 Office 33 33 $2,161

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 24 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
AIRSUPRA
$271 — —
REXULTI
$178 — —
FARXIGA
$170 51 —
AREXVY
$152 21 —
VRAYLAR
$148 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 24 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

973 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Family Medicine in Arkansas

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record