Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Vikramjeet Kumar

Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism Elyria, OH Medical Doctor

NPI 1841271269 CMS profile 356648

673 E River St, Elyria, OH 44035

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$105,817

874 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Vikramjeet Kumar of Elyria, OH is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $105,817 across 874 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 93rd percentile of Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $2,785 103
2024 General $6,273 95
2023 General $8,910 94
2022 General $16,506 115
2021 General $19,717 143
2020 General $25,536 139
2019 General $26,090 185

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Vikramjeet Kumar
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism median
  • Middle half of Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Vikramjeet Kumar were reported at $2,785. Among 5,868 Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism profiles paid that year, the median was $507 and the middle half received between $135 and $1,838.

Show as a table
Year Vikramjeet Kumar Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism median Middle half National median
2019 $26,090 $494 $123–$2,253 $163
2020 $25,536 $335 $85–$1,841 $114
2021 $19,717 $398 $88–$1,981 $132
2022 $16,506 $364 $88–$1,568 $149
2023 $8,910 $420 $113–$1,614 $160
2024 $6,273 $440 $121–$1,646 $164
2025 $2,785 $507 $135–$1,838 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Novo Nordisk Inc $36,547 185 payments
  2. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $32,659 79 payments
  3. Mannkind Corporation $17,058 126 payments
  4. Corcept Therapeutics $4,598 66 payments
  5. Senseonics, Incorporated $3,440 4 payments
  6. Xeris Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $1,353 45 payments
  7. Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC $1,114 23 payments
  8. Lilly USA, LLC $1,030 60 payments
  9. Insulet Corporation $952 10 payments
  10. Dexcom, Inc. $791 34 payments
  11. Other $6,276 242 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $79,952 47 payments
  2. Food and Beverage $19,265 790 payments
  3. Travel and Lodging $4,109 27 payments
  4. Consulting Fee $2,250 1 payment
  5. Education $182 8 payments
  6. Gift $59 1 payment
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. FARXIGA $32,629 77 payments
  2. RYBELSUS $19,377 108 payments
  3. Ozempic $17,447 143 payments
  4. AFREZZA $16,930 116 payments
  5. Korlym $4,598 66 payments
  6. Eversense $3,440 4 payments
  7. Omnipod $901 7 payments
  8. GVOKE HYPOPEN $618 17 payments
  9. TEPEZZA $598 17 payments
  10. SOLIQUA 100/33 $536 6 payments
  11. Other $12,197 559 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 75 drugs

Part D claims

4,113

Median for General Practice: 1,105

Drug cost

$1,498,127

Median for General Practice: $48,734

Branded share of claims

54.9%

Median for General Practice: 17.1%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 208 $268,782
Trulicity Dulaglutide Brand 154 $169,365
Tresiba Flextouch U-200 Insulin Degludec Brand 75 $97,557
Rybelsus Semaglutide Brand 66 $85,038
Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 76 $70,273
Mounjaro Tirzepatide Brand 57 $69,452
Toujeo Max Solostar Insulin Glargine,hum.Rec.Anlog Brand 29 $67,850
Humalog Kwikpen U-200 Insulin Lispro Brand 22 $64,326
Fiasp Flextouch Insulin Aspart (Niacinamide) Brand 73 $57,664
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 50 $52,047

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 75 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 7,210 Part D prescribers listed as General Practice; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 30 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$168,624

Medicare's payments for the services billed

Medicare patients

447

Average age 72

Services billed

3,636

274 women, 173 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Diabetes 65%
Arthritis 49%
Chronic kidney disease 41%
Ischemic heart disease 39%
Depression 28%
COPD 25%
Heart failure 24%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 18 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
AFREZZA
  • Mannkind Corporation $4,050
$4,050 — —
TEPEZZA
  • Amgen Inc. $545
$545 — —
Korlym
  • Corcept Therapeutics $186
$186 — —
GVOKE HYPOPEN
  • Xeris Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $146
$146 15 —
Kerendia
  • Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc. $121
$121 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 18 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

874 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism in Ohio

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record