Who Paid My Doc
Victoria Odoh
Nurse Practitioner, Acute Care Seattle, WA Nurse Practitioner
NPI 1265048300 CMS profile 10639578
1660 S Columbian Way, Seattle, WA 98108
General payments
$445
Research payments
$0
Ownership & investment interest
$0
Through program year 2025, Victoria Odoh of Seattle, WA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $445 across 17 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.
No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.
General payments for this record sit in the 59th percentile of Nurse Practitioner, Acute Care profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.
By program year
1 row| Year | Kind | Relative to this record's peak year | Amount | Records |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | General | $445 | 17 |
Beside peers
- Victoria Odoh
- Nurse Practitioner, Acute Care median
- Middle half of Nurse Practitioner, Acute Care
- National median
In program year 2025, general payments to Victoria Odoh were reported at $445. Among 11,827 Nurse Practitioner, Acute Care profiles paid that year, the median was $152 and the middle half received between $48 and $458.
Show as a table
| Year | Victoria Odoh | Nurse Practitioner, Acute Care median | Middle half | National median |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | $0 | — | — | $163 |
| 2020 | $0 | — | — | $114 |
| 2021 | $0 | $123 | $38–$327 | $132 |
| 2022 | $0 | $130 | $44–$369 | $149 |
| 2023 | $0 | $144 | $49–$410 | $160 |
| 2024 | $0 | $146 | $48–$433 | $164 |
| 2025 | $445 | $152 | $48–$458 | $169 |
Breakdown
A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.
Billing to Medicare
Part B · data year 2024 · 5 billing codesPaid by Medicare
$4,513
Medicare patients
36
Services billed
55
| Condition among their Medicare patients | Relative to the most common | Share of patients |
|---|---|---|
| High blood pressure | 75% | |
| Depression | 56% | |
| Alzheimer's or dementia | 53% | |
| Diabetes | 50% | |
| Arthritis | 42% | |
| Chronic kidney disease | 33% |
Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.
Records
17 reportedEvery payment, record by record
Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.
Other Nurse Practitioner, Acute Care in Washington
Jennifer Hartley
Nurse Practitioner, Acute Care · Seattle, WA
Elizabeth Perpetua
Nurse Practitioner, Acute Care · Seattle, WA
Leslie Casias
Nurse Practitioner, Acute Care · Seattle, WA
Joelle Fathi
Nurse Practitioner, Acute Care · Seattle, WA
Sirithepphavanh Oliver
Nurse Practitioner, Acute Care · Seattle, WA
John King
Nurse Practitioner, Acute Care · Wenatchee, WA
Related records
Nurse Practitioner, Acute Care in Washington
Practitioners in the same specialty and state, ranked by reported value.
All Nurse Practitioner, Acute Care
Everyone recorded under this specialty, nationwide.
Doctors in Washington
Every practitioner in the state with a reported payment.
How to read this page
What each amount means, and what it does not mean.
What this means
U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.
An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.
Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.