Nurse Practitioner Program year 2025 Reported 2022–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Victoria Lanski

Nurse Practitioner, Acute Care Reno, NV Nurse Practitioner

NPI 1851964381 CMS profile 11212995

1155 Mill St, M14, Reno, NV 89502

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$4,684

77 records reported · program years 2022–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2022–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$34,200 paid to institutions, not to them · program year 2024

Through program year 2025, Victoria Lanski of Reno, NV is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $4,684 across 77 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $34,200 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 94th percentile of Nurse Practitioner, Acute Care profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

4 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $186 5
2024 General $567 20
2023 General $3,330 37
2022 General $601 15

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Victoria Lanski
  • Nurse Practitioner, Acute Care median
  • Middle half of Nurse Practitioner, Acute Care
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Victoria Lanski were reported at $186. Among 11,827 Nurse Practitioner, Acute Care profiles paid that year, the median was $152 and the middle half received between $48 and $458.

Show as a table
Year Victoria Lanski Nurse Practitioner, Acute Care median Middle half National median
2019 $0 — — $163
2020 $0 — — $114
2021 $0 $123 $38–$327 $132
2022 $601 $130 $44–$369 $149
2023 $3,330 $144 $49–$410 $160
2024 $567 $146 $48–$433 $164
2025 $186 $152 $48–$458 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2022–2025
  1. Genentech USA, Inc. $2,675 7 payments
  2. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $741 36 payments
  3. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $675 18 payments
  4. Regeneron Healthcare Solutions, Inc. $264 4 payments
  5. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $188 6 payments
  6. Insmed, Inc. $47 2 payments
  7. Philips Electronics North America Corporation $33 2 payments
  8. Baxter Healthcare $31 1 payment
  9. Respicardia, Inc. $31 1 payment

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2022–2025
  1. Travel and Lodging $2,622 3 payments
  2. Food and Beverage $2,051 73 payments
  3. Education $11 1 payment
Products named General payments · program years 2022–2025
  1. BREZTRI $552 13 payments
  2. TRELEGY ELLIPTA $516 26 payments
  3. AREXVY $125 1 payment
  4. NUCALA $99 9 payments
  5. AIRSUPRA $76 3 payments
  6. DUPIXENT $57 2 payments
  7. STIOLTO RESPIMAT $48 3 payments
  8. Arikayce $47 2 payments
  9. OFEV $34 2 payments
  10. (AK6) Vest Therapy $33 2 payments
  11. Other $89 3 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 23 drugs

Part D claims

1,556

Median for Nurse Practitioner: 389

Drug cost

$753,492

Median for Nurse Practitioner: $21,885

Branded share of claims

79%

Median for Nurse Practitioner: 19.6%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Trelegy Ellipta Fluticasone/Umeclidin/Vilanter Brand 328 $375,449
Spiriva Respimat Tiotropium Bromide Brand 98 $84,354
Breo Ellipta Fluticasone/Vilanterol Brand 86 $55,497
Breztri Aerosphere Budesonide/Glycopyr/Formoterol Brand 36 $39,497
Stiolto Respimat Tiotropium Br/Olodaterol Hcl Brand 35 $36,163
Anoro Ellipta Umeclidinium Brm/Vilanterol Tr Brand 47 $35,184
Wixela Inhub Fluticasone Propion/Salmeterol Brand 67 $23,989
Symbicort Budesonide/Formoterol Fumarate Brand 45 $23,496
Advair Hfa Fluticasone Propion/Salmeterol Brand 35 $21,387
Fluticasone-Salmeterol Fluticasone Propion/Salmeterol Brand 75 $21,066

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 23 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 229,976 Part D prescribers listed as Nurse Practitioner; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 7 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$31,373

Medicare's payments for the services billed

Medicare patients

446

Average age 74

Services billed

663

245 women, 201 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 72%
COPD 51%
Arthritis 49%
Ischemic heart disease 33%
Diabetes 28%
Atrial fibrillation 28%
Chronic kidney disease 26%
Heart failure 25%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 7 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
TRELEGY ELLIPTA
  • GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $144
$144 328 —
AREXVY
  • GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $125
$125 — —
AIRSUPRA
  • AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $76
$76 — —
DUPIXENT
  • Regeneron Healthcare Solutions, Inc. $57
$57 — —
NUCALA
  • GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $23
$23 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 7 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

77 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record