Medical Doctor Program year 2022 Reported 2019–2022 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Victoria Fedorova

Geriatric Medicine Washington, DC Medical Doctor

NPI 1306100185 CMS profile 1375391

1160 Varnum St Ne, Depaul 021, Washington, DC 20017

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$997

5 records reported · program years 2019–2022

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2022

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2022, Victoria Fedorova of Washington, DC is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $997 across 5 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 75th percentile of Geriatric Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

3 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2022 General $933 2
2021 General $23 1
2019 General $42 2

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Victoria Fedorova
  • Geriatric Medicine median
  • Middle half of Geriatric Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Victoria Fedorova were reported at $0. Among 1,028 Geriatric Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $123 and the middle half received between $35 and $408.

Show as a table
Year Victoria Fedorova Geriatric Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $42 $122 $40–$435 $163
2020 $0 $98 $25–$349 $114
2021 $23 $125 $34–$441 $132
2022 $933 $124 $36–$408 $149
2023 $0 $121 $41–$383 $160
2024 $0 $134 $41–$435 $164
2025 $0 $123 $35–$408 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2022
  1. Dentsply Sirona Inc $933 2 payments
  2. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $24 1 payment
  3. Abbott Laboratories $23 1 payment
  4. Amgen Inc. $18 1 payment

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2022
  1. Food and Beverage $630 4 payments
  2. Education $367 1 payment
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2022
  1. FreeStyle Lite system $23 1 payment
  2. AIMOVIG $18 1 payment
  3. Repatha $18 1 payment

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 150 drugs

Part D claims

8,798

Median for Geriatric Medicine: 2,306

Drug cost

$859,467

Median for Geriatric Medicine: $150,713

Branded share of claims

19%

Median for Geriatric Medicine: 16.5%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 160 $120,349
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 101 $89,135
Januvia Sitagliptin Phosphate Brand 91 $84,834
Trulicity Dulaglutide Brand 43 $66,615
Myrbetriq Mirabegron Brand 75 $60,643
Entresto Sacubitril/Valsartan Brand 52 $47,206
Xarelto Rivaroxaban Brand 64 $42,962
Janumet Sitagliptin Phos/Metformin Hcl Brand 27 $29,801
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 23 $24,479
Linzess Linaclotide Brand 26 $21,244

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 150 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 1,814 Part D prescribers listed as Geriatric Medicine; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 43 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$157,473

Of which drugs: $8,123

Medicare patients

386

Average age 83

Services billed

2,011

305 women, 81 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 52%
Diabetes 47%
Alzheimer's or dementia 40%
Chronic kidney disease 36%
Ischemic heart disease 27%
Heart failure 23%
Depression 23%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Vaccine for influenza for injection into muscle 90662 Office 70 72 $5,653
Pcv20 vaccine im 90677 Office 20 20 $2,470

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Records

5 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Geriatric Medicine in District of Columbia

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2022

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record