Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Victor Biton

Clinical Neurophysiology Little Rock, AR Medical Doctor

NPI 1124084124 CMS profile 1135659

2 Lile Ct, Ste 100, Little Rock, AR 72205

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$7,702

319 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$5,440

Paid to them · 4 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$668,914 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2019–2025

Through program year 2025, Victor Biton of Little Rock, AR is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $7,702 across 319 general payments and $5,440 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $668,914 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 81st percentile of Clinical Neurophysiology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

10 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $624 29
2024 General $673 30
2023 General $943 50
2022 General $951 57
2022 Research $2,300 1
2021 General $2,077 64
2021 Research $840 2
2020 General $938 51
2019 General $1,495 38
2019 Research $2,300 1

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Victor Biton
  • Clinical Neurophysiology median
  • Middle half of Clinical Neurophysiology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Victor Biton were reported at $624. Among 259 Clinical Neurophysiology profiles paid that year, the median was $435 and the middle half received between $121 and $1,917.

Show as a table
Year Victor Biton Clinical Neurophysiology median Middle half National median
2019 $1,495 $306 $88–$1,636 $163
2020 $938 $299 $85–$1,847 $114
2021 $2,077 $325 $96–$2,308 $132
2022 $951 $395 $106–$1,957 $149
2023 $943 $388 $120–$1,718 $160
2024 $673 $471 $137–$1,931 $164
2025 $624 $435 $121–$1,917 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. UCB, Inc. $1,846 59 payments
  2. Eisai Inc. $1,466 42 payments
  3. SK Life Science, Inc. $1,372 74 payments
  4. Sunovion Pharmaceuticals Inc. $933 54 payments
  5. Greenwich Biosciences, Inc. $591 15 payments
  6. Sumitomo Pharma America, Inc. $452 26 payments
  7. Neurelis, Inc. $320 14 payments
  8. Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $243 12 payments
  9. Jazz Pharmaceuticals Inc. $180 8 payments
  10. Catalyst Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $115 5 payments
  11. Other $183 10 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $6,242 317 payments
  2. Education $755 1 payment
  3. Consulting Fee $705 1 payment
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Fycompa Neurology $1,466 42 payments
  2. APTIOM Cns $1,294 75 payments
  3. Briviact $977 49 payments
  4. Epidiolex $771 23 payments
  5. VALTOCO $320 14 payments
  6. TROKENDI XR $176 9 payments
  7. FYCOMPA Neurology $115 5 payments
  8. Vimpat $95 6 payments
  9. OXTELLAR XR $67 3 payments
  10. APTIOM Neurology $55 3 payments
  11. Other $321 17 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Research payments came from Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. UCB, Inc. $5,440 4 payments

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 45 drugs

Part D claims

6,469

Median for Neurology: 833

Drug cost

$1,678,648

Median for Neurology: $202,670

Branded share of claims

21.9%

Median for Neurology: 25.9%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Xcopri Cenobamate Brand 351 $495,900
Aptiom Eslicarbazepine Acetate Brand 80 $236,532
Fycompa Perampanel Brand 140 $176,616
Epidiolex Cannabidiol (Cbd) Brand 23 $146,942
Briviact Brivaracetam Brand 90 $137,313
Keppra Levetiracetam Brand 51 $96,329
Dilantin Phenytoin Sodium Extended Brand 224 $55,858
Lacosamide Generic 312 $49,539
Clobazam Generic 366 $43,102
Levetiracetam Generic 965 $37,830

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 45 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 13,695 Part D prescribers listed as Neurology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 18 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$207,866

Medicare's payments for the services billed

Medicare patients

287

Average age 65

Services billed

989

169 women, 118 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 67%
Arthritis 40%
Depression 33%
Ischemic heart disease 21%
Diabetes 20%
Chronic kidney disease 16%
Osteoporosis 14%
Atrial fibrillation 13%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 6 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
Briviact
  • UCB, Inc. $162
$162 90 —
VALTOCO
  • Neurelis, Inc. $94
$94 — —
FYCOMPA
  • CATALYST PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. $64
$64 140 —
APTIOM
  • Sumitomo Pharma America, Inc. $55
$55 80 —
UBRELVY
  • AbbVie, Inc. $30
$30 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 6 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

323 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Clinical Neurophysiology in Arkansas

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record