Nurse Practitioner Program year 2025 Reported 2021–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Vicki Haines

Nurse Practitioner Pasco, WA Nurse Practitioner

NPI 1720386808 CMS profile 11132073

9221 Sandifur Pkwy Ste A, Pasco, WA 99301

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$56,811

861 records reported · program years 2021–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2021–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Vicki Haines of Pasco, WA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $56,811 across 861 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 99th percentile of Nurse Practitioner profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

5 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $19,169 203
2024 General $5,680 181
2023 General $10,590 170
2022 General $12,605 154
2021 General $8,768 153

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Vicki Haines
  • Nurse Practitioner median
  • Middle half of Nurse Practitioner
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Vicki Haines were reported at $19,169. Among 41,044 Nurse Practitioner profiles paid that year, the median was $174 and the middle half received between $55 and $557.

Show as a table
Year Vicki Haines Nurse Practitioner median Middle half National median
2019 $0 $50 $22–$97 $163
2020 $0 $40 $16–$108 $114
2021 $8,768 $135 $40–$426 $132
2022 $12,605 $152 $48–$470 $149
2023 $10,590 $166 $54–$529 $160
2024 $5,680 $173 $55–$556 $164
2025 $19,169 $174 $55–$557 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $20,162 231 payments
  2. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $6,054 196 payments
  3. Lilly USA, LLC $5,346 33 payments
  4. Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Inc. $4,305 23 payments
  5. Regeneron Healthcare Solutions, Inc. $3,794 35 payments
  6. UCB, Inc. $3,644 52 payments
  7. Galderma Laboratories, L.P. $3,309 22 payments
  8. Genzyme Corporation $2,407 51 payments
  9. Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC $1,400 2 payments
  10. LEO Pharma Inc. $1,291 26 payments
  11. Other $5,099 190 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $36,430 50 payments
  2. Food and Beverage $14,324 784 payments
  3. Consulting Fee $3,339 9 payments
  4. Honoraria $1,890 3 payments
  5. Education $826 14 payments
  6. Travel and Lodging $3 1 payment
Products named General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. SKYRIZI $10,599 120 payments
  2. TREMFYA $7,079 173 payments
  3. RINVOQ $5,932 54 payments
  4. EBGLYSS $4,995 14 payments
  5. ILUMYA $4,155 19 payments
  6. HUMIRA $3,713 28 payments
  7. DUPIXENT Immunology And Inflammation $3,130 10 payments
  8. Bimzelx $3,044 27 payments
  9. NEMLUVIO $2,937 10 payments
  10. DUPIXENT Immunology $2,580 56 payments
  11. Other $9,149 445 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 21 drugs

Part D claims

1,006

Median for Nurse Practitioner: 389

Drug cost

$1,854,535

Median for Nurse Practitioner: $21,885

Branded share of claims

31.9%

Median for Nurse Practitioner: 19.6%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Skyrizi Pen Risankizumab-Rzaa Brand 28 $620,251
Cosentyx Unoready Pen Secukinumab Brand 36 $382,430
Humira(Cf) Pen Adalimumab Brand 32 $309,084
Dupixent Pen Dupilumab Brand 71 $297,842
Cosentyx Sensoready (2 Pens) Secukinumab Brand 22 $180,077
Dupixent Syringe Dupilumab Brand 11 $47,842
Triamcinolone Acetonide Generic 284 $3,789
Tacrolimus Generic 29 $3,591
Clobetasol Propionate Generic 84 $3,513
Nystatin Generic 94 $1,399

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 21 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 229,976 Part D prescribers listed as Nurse Practitioner; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 76 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$368,322

Of which drugs: $197,976

Medicare patients

806

Average age 75

Services billed

9,398

425 women, 381 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 65%
Arthritis 42%
Diabetes 25%
Chronic kidney disease 18%
Ischemic heart disease 17%
Cancer 15%
Depression 15%
Atrial fibrillation 14%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Aminolevulinic acid hcl for topical administration, 10% gel, 10 mg J7345 Office 20 4,600 $6,134

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 28 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
SKYRIZI
$2,190 28 —
RINVOQ
$723 — —
TREMFYA
$590 — —
DUPIXENT
$464 82 —
Bimzelx
$200 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 28 with Patron

Records

861 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Nurse Practitioner in Washington

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record