Doctor of Osteopathy Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Vasimahmed Lala

Internal Medicine Pontiac, MI Doctor of Osteopathy

NPI 1780065508 CMS profile 1319180

50 N Perry St, Pontiac, MI 48342

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$49,546

813 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Vasimahmed Lala of Pontiac, MI is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $49,546 across 813 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 98th percentile of Internal Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $6,088 185
2024 General $20,217 204
2023 General $6,989 181
2022 General $10,503 139
2021 General $2,677 43
2020 General $1,694 37
2019 General $1,378 24

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Vasimahmed Lala
  • Internal Medicine median
  • Middle half of Internal Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Vasimahmed Lala were reported at $6,088. Among 52,115 Internal Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $156 and the middle half received between $47 and $551.

Show as a table
Year Vasimahmed Lala Internal Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $1,378 $159 $48–$570 $163
2020 $1,694 $119 $33–$402 $114
2021 $2,677 $135 $37–$521 $132
2022 $10,503 $141 $42–$496 $149
2023 $6,989 $149 $45–$519 $160
2024 $20,217 $154 $47–$537 $164
2025 $6,088 $156 $47–$551 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. $11,413 24 payments
  2. AngioDynamics, Inc. $9,518 174 payments
  3. Boston Scientific Corporation $4,225 103 payments
  4. Abbott Laboratories $3,572 66 payments
  5. Abiomed $2,893 39 payments
  6. Philips Electronics North America Corporation $2,021 37 payments
  7. Shockwave Medical, Inc $1,906 21 payments
  8. Medtronic, Inc. $1,826 44 payments
  9. Inari Medical, Inc. $1,609 15 payments
  10. Osprey Medical Inc $1,250 1 payment
  11. Other $9,314 289 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $30,786 785 payments
  2. Consulting Fee $13,650 4 payments
  3. Travel and Lodging $4,191 17 payments
  4. Grant $563 1 payment
  5. Education $357 6 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AURYON LASER SYSTEM 100-120 VAC $9,307 172 payments
  2. Impella $2,258 28 payments
  3. CT THROMBECTOMY SYSTEM KIT $1,672 16 payments
  4. FLOWTRIEVER CATHETER, S $1,672 16 payments
  5. DyeVert $1,250 1 payment
  6. Shockwave IVL System with the Shockwave C2 Coronary IVL Catheter $1,227 12 payments
  7. VersaCross Access Solution $1,170 7 payments
  8. Indigo System $945 3 payments
  9. LifeVest $767 31 payments
  10. Halo One Thin-Walled Guiding Sheath $677 3 payments
  11. Other $19,189 535 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 17 drugs

Part D claims

623

Median for Interventional Cardiology: 2,236

Drug cost

$183,921

Median for Interventional Cardiology: $380,412

Branded share of claims

55.1%

Median for Interventional Cardiology: 27.8%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Xarelto Rivaroxaban Brand 66 $48,645
Entresto Sacubitril/Valsartan Brand 37 $32,755
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 42 $31,926
Mounjaro Tirzepatide Brand 24 $31,053
Repatha Sureclick Evolocumab Brand 23 $18,518
Trulicity Dulaglutide Brand 11 $10,262
Praluent Pen Alirocumab Brand 12 $6,651
Clopidogrel Clopidogrel Bisulfate Brand 128 $1,232
Chlorthalidone Generic 49 $681
Carvedilol Generic 87 $491

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 17 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 4,694 Part D prescribers listed as Interventional Cardiology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 174 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$4,529,709

Of which drugs: $8,197

Medicare patients

1,691

Average age 77

Services billed

18,151

837 women, 854 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Ischemic heart disease 75%
Arthritis 73%
Diabetes 71%
Heart failure 46%
Depression 40%
Chronic kidney disease 39%
Atrial fibrillation 35%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, regadenoson, 0.1 mg J2785 Office 130 520 $2,583
Injection, aminophyllin, up to 250 mg J0280 Office 30 30 $203

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 15 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
Arcalyst
$261 — —
VERQUVO
$131 — —
Kerendia
$74 — —
LEQVIO
$63 — —
Repatha
$61 23 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 15 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

813 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Internal Medicine in Michigan

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record