Doctor of Osteopathy Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Valerie Norton

Internal Medicine Corinth, MS Doctor of Osteopathy

NPI 1770855173 CMS profile 413765

2000 E Shiloh Rd, Corinth, MS 38834

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$6,066

368 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Valerie Norton of Corinth, MS is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $6,066 across 368 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 91st percentile of Internal Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $1,694 102
2024 General $1,745 108
2023 General $1,628 99
2022 General $207 13
2021 General $389 18
2020 General $80 5
2019 General $323 23

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Valerie Norton
  • Internal Medicine median
  • Middle half of Internal Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Valerie Norton were reported at $1,694. Among 52,115 Internal Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $156 and the middle half received between $47 and $551.

Show as a table
Year Valerie Norton Internal Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $323 $159 $48–$570 $163
2020 $80 $119 $33–$402 $114
2021 $389 $135 $37–$521 $132
2022 $207 $141 $42–$496 $149
2023 $1,628 $149 $45–$519 $160
2024 $1,745 $154 $47–$537 $164
2025 $1,694 $156 $47–$551 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Novo Nordisk Inc $783 55 payments
  2. Lilly USA, LLC $598 50 payments
  3. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $454 31 payments
  4. Pfizer Inc. $346 24 payments
  5. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $327 19 payments
  6. AbbVie, Inc. $327 22 payments
  7. Amgen Inc. $315 24 payments
  8. Astellas Pharma US Inc $310 15 payments
  9. Otsuka America Pharmaceutical, Inc. $297 11 payments
  10. Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc $253 16 payments
  11. Other $2,056 101 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $6,066 368 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Ozempic $507 37 payments
  2. RYBELSUS $467 34 payments
  3. TRELEGY ELLIPTA $380 26 payments
  4. MOUNJARO $333 27 payments
  5. NURTEC ODT $330 23 payments
  6. REXULTI $297 11 payments
  7. YUPELRI $265 11 payments
  8. Veozah $262 12 payments
  9. XARELTO $253 16 payments
  10. Wegovy $252 16 payments
  11. Other $4,211 260 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 162 drugs

Part D claims

11,824

Median for Internal Medicine: 777

Drug cost

$577,747

Median for Internal Medicine: $73,373

Branded share of claims

16.4%

Median for Internal Medicine: 19.3%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 130 $125,786
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 60 $45,312
Mounjaro Tirzepatide Brand 38 $39,985
Trelegy Ellipta Fluticasone/Umeclidin/Vilanter Brand 53 $38,819
Xarelto Rivaroxaban Brand 57 $34,874
Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 47 $34,442
Linzess Linaclotide Brand 26 $24,106
Entresto Sacubitril/Valsartan Brand 28 $21,008
Tresiba Flextouch U-100 Insulin Degludec Brand 16 $18,815
Trulicity Dulaglutide Brand 19 $17,337

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 162 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 104,182 Part D prescribers listed as Internal Medicine; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 82 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$285,421

Of which drugs: $8,496

Medicare patients

765

Average age 73

Services billed

7,921

446 women, 319 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 46%
Diabetes 36%
Ischemic heart disease 29%
Depression 27%
Chronic kidney disease 26%
COPD 22%
Heart failure 19%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Vaccine for influenza for injection into muscle 90653 Office 60 60 $4,827
Injection, triamcinolone acetonide, not otherwise specified, 10 mg J3301 Office 16 96 $63
Injection, ketorolac tromethamine, per 15 mg J1885 Office 17 72 $34
Injection, vitamin b-12 cyanocobalamin, up to 1000 mcg J3420 Office 13 40 $34
Injection, ceftriaxone sodium, per 250 mg J0696 Office 15 64 $23
Injection, dexamethasone sodium phosphate, 1 mg J1100 Office 53 240 $20

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 34 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
REXULTI
  • Otsuka America Pharmaceutical, Inc. $149
  • Lundbeck LLC $65
$213 — —
NURTEC ODT
  • PFIZER INC. $129
$129 — —
TRELEGY ELLIPTA
  • GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $115
$115 53 —
Wegovy
  • Novo Nordisk Inc $105
$105 — —
YUPELRI
  • Mylan Specialty L.P. $104
$104 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 34 with Patron

Records

368 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Internal Medicine in Mississippi

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record