Doctor of Osteopathy Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Tyler Rencher

Internal Medicine Saint George, UT Doctor of Osteopathy

NPI 1649614744 CMS profile 1987583

630 S 400 E Ste 101, Saint George, UT 84770

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$2,697

161 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Tyler Rencher of Saint George, UT is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $2,697 across 161 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 83rd percentile of Internal Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $101 6
2024 General $301 15
2023 General $227 13
2022 General $302 18
2021 General $657 42
2020 General $829 49
2019 General $280 18

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Tyler Rencher
  • Internal Medicine median
  • Middle half of Internal Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Tyler Rencher were reported at $101. Among 52,115 Internal Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $156 and the middle half received between $47 and $551.

Show as a table
Year Tyler Rencher Internal Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $280 $159 $48–$570 $163
2020 $829 $119 $33–$402 $114
2021 $657 $135 $37–$521 $132
2022 $302 $141 $42–$496 $149
2023 $227 $149 $45–$519 $160
2024 $301 $154 $47–$537 $164
2025 $101 $156 $47–$551 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $342 21 payments
  2. Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc $290 16 payments
  3. Pfizer Inc. $252 15 payments
  4. Novo Nordisk Inc $177 12 payments
  5. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $149 11 payments
  6. Amgen Inc. $146 7 payments
  7. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation $130 9 payments
  8. Lilly USA, LLC $122 8 payments
  9. Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc. $118 8 payments
  10. IBSA Pharma Inc. $97 5 payments
  11. Other $875 49 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $2,696 160 payments
  2. Education $1 1 payment
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. XARELTO $229 13 payments
  2. VRAYLAR $192 13 payments
  3. Ozempic $163 11 payments
  4. RYBELSUS $133 9 payments
  5. INVOKANA $121 7 payments
  6. NURTEC ODT $114 6 payments
  7. UBRELVY $108 5 payments
  8. COLOGUARD $101 6 payments
  9. Tirosint $97 5 payments
  10. EVENITY $84 4 payments
  11. Other $2,365 149 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 80 drugs

Part D claims

2,481

Median for Internal Medicine: 777

Drug cost

$141,844

Median for Internal Medicine: $73,373

Branded share of claims

20.9%

Median for Internal Medicine: 19.3%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 41 $43,765
Mounjaro Tirzepatide Brand 21 $26,789
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 12 $21,054
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 14 $14,716
Gabapentin Generic 97 $1,962
Duloxetine Hcl Generic 35 $1,800
Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen Hydrocodone/Acetaminophen Brand 69 $1,494
Atorvastatin Calcium Generic 119 $1,454
Levothyroxine Sodium Generic 127 $1,365
Liothyronine Sodium Generic 47 $1,200

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 80 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 104,182 Part D prescribers listed as Internal Medicine; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 64 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$73,063

Of which drugs: $1,063

Medicare patients

229

Average age 75

Services billed

1,218

129 women, 100 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 66%
Arthritis 46%
Depression 24%
Diabetes 23%
Chronic kidney disease 21%
Ischemic heart disease 19%
Atrial fibrillation 18%
Osteoporosis 16%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Vaccine for influenza for administration into muscle, 0.5 ml dosage 90656 Office 12 12 $263
Injection, vitamin b-12 cyanocobalamin, up to 1000 mcg J3420 Office 11 30 $21

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 15 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
VRAYLAR
  • AbbVie, Inc. $48
$48 — —
XARELTO
  • Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc $33
$33 — —
KRYSTEXXA
  • Amgen Inc. $31
$31 — —
QUVIVIQ
  • IDORSIA PHARMACEUTICALS US INC $17
$17 — —
REXULTI
  • Lundbeck LLC $16
$16 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 15 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

161 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Internal Medicine in Utah

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record