Doctor of Optometry Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Tyler McFaden

Optometrist Montgomery, AL Doctor of Optometry

NPI 1447690771 CMS profile 1229985

4131 Troy Hwy, Montgomery, AL 36116

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$5,744

248 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Tyler McFaden of Montgomery, AL is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $5,744 across 248 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 94th percentile of Optometrist profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $1,275 61
2024 General $724 42
2023 General $692 44
2022 General $739 35
2021 General $664 27
2020 General $708 18
2019 General $941 21

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Tyler McFaden
  • Optometrist median
  • Middle half of Optometrist
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Tyler McFaden were reported at $1,275. Among 35,373 Optometrist profiles paid that year, the median was $204 and the middle half received between $87 and $464.

Show as a table
Year Tyler McFaden Optometrist median Middle half National median
2019 $941 $159 $67–$371 $163
2020 $708 $72 $29–$165 $114
2021 $664 $125 $46–$292 $132
2022 $739 $162 $66–$374 $149
2023 $692 $177 $72–$406 $160
2024 $724 $188 $77–$427 $164
2025 $1,275 $204 $87–$464 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Kala Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $1,378 24 payments
  2. Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Inc. $1,297 74 payments
  3. Alcon Vision LLC $768 31 payments
  4. Bausch & Lomb Americas Inc. $641 42 payments
  5. AbbVie, Inc. $323 12 payments
  6. Dompe US, Inc. $172 6 payments
  7. Oyster Point Pharma, Inc. $157 6 payments
  8. Eyevance Pharmaceuticals LLC $144 9 payments
  9. Tarsus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $136 7 payments
  10. Bausch & Lomb, a division of Bausch Health US, LLC $130 7 payments
  11. Other $598 30 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $5,486 246 payments
  2. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $240 1 payment
  3. Education $18 1 payment
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. INVELTYS $1,378 24 payments
  2. Cequa $1,281 74 payments
  3. VYZULTA $308 21 payments
  4. Rocklatan $245 13 payments
  5. Pataday $240 1 payment
  6. MIEBO $188 11 payments
  7. OXERVATE $172 6 payments
  8. XIIDRA $158 9 payments
  9. EYSUVIS $150 9 payments
  10. XEN GLAUCOMA TREATMENT SYSTEM $147 1 payment
  11. Other $2,284 125 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 29 drugs

Part D claims

1,968

Median for Optometry: 120

Drug cost

$323,210

Median for Optometry: $8,864

Branded share of claims

38.8%

Median for Optometry: 24.3%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Restasis Cyclosporine Brand 61 $65,295
Lumigan Bimatoprost Brand 144 $61,777
Cyclosporine Generic 45 $33,016
Miebo Perfluorohexyloctane/Pf Brand 33 $26,883
Vyzulta Latanoprostene Bunod Brand 55 $22,230
Simbrinza Brinzolamide/Brimonidine Tart Brand 62 $17,022
Xiidra Lifitegrast Brand 15 $15,649
Cequa Cyclosporine Brand 12 $12,428
Tyrvaya Varenicline Tartrate Brand 16 $9,814
Latanoprost Generic 551 $9,509

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 29 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 27,653 Part D prescribers listed as Optometry; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 23 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$93,869

Medicare's payments for the services billed

Medicare patients

915

Average age 76

Services billed

1,675

576 women, 339 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 49%
Ischemic heart disease 33%
Diabetes 29%
Chronic kidney disease 23%
Atrial fibrillation 20%
Cancer 17%
Osteoporosis 17%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 8 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
Cequa
  • Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Inc. $334
$334 12 —
VYZULTA
  • Bausch & Lomb Americas Inc. $76
$76 55 —
XDEMVY
  • Tarsus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $66
$66 — —
Rocklatan
  • Alcon Vision LLC $61
$61 — —
MIEBO
  • Bausch & Lomb Americas Inc. $32
$32 33 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 8 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

248 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Optometrist in Alabama

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record