Doctor of Osteopathy Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Tung Henry Tang

Neurology Simi Valley, CA Doctor of Osteopathy

NPI 1700069630 CMS profile 122774

2650 Jones Way Ste 30, Simi Valley, CA 93065

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$19,789

1,073 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Tung Henry Tang of Simi Valley, CA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $19,789 across 1,073 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 83rd percentile of Neurology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $2,990 134
2024 General $3,661 176
2023 General $3,383 192
2022 General $2,912 178
2021 General $2,547 154
2020 General $2,293 131
2019 General $2,003 108

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Tung Henry Tang
  • Neurology median
  • Middle half of Neurology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Tung Henry Tang were reported at $2,990. Among 11,022 Neurology profiles paid that year, the median was $457 and the middle half received between $118 and $2,344.

Show as a table
Year Tung Henry Tang Neurology median Middle half National median
2019 $2,003 $474 $118–$2,177 $163
2020 $2,293 $367 $82–$2,309 $114
2021 $2,547 $438 $104–$2,547 $132
2022 $2,912 $442 $103–$2,388 $149
2023 $3,383 $464 $119–$2,312 $160
2024 $3,661 $468 $119–$2,323 $164
2025 $2,990 $457 $118–$2,344 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $2,863 214 payments
  2. UCB, Inc. $1,243 52 payments
  3. Pfizer Inc. $904 66 payments
  4. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. $815 40 payments
  5. US WorldMeds, LLC $776 24 payments
  6. Biogen, Inc. $695 30 payments
  7. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $687 44 payments
  8. SK Life Science, Inc. $651 37 payments
  9. Allergan Inc. $608 37 payments
  10. Amgen Inc. $520 28 payments
  11. Other $10,027 501 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $19,238 1,061 payments
  2. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $377 8 payments
  3. Consulting Fee $150 1 payment
  4. Education $24 3 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. QULIPTA $1,790 142 payments
  2. UBRELVY $1,260 93 payments
  3. NURTEC ODT Pain $844 62 payments
  4. ZAVZPRET $774 58 payments
  5. AIMOVIG $628 39 payments
  6. Briviact $571 22 payments
  7. NURTEC ODT Primary Care $566 63 payments
  8. Hizentra $511 25 payments
  9. BOTOX $500 28 payments
  10. VALTOCO $443 23 payments
  11. Other $13,623 650 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 68 drugs

Part D claims

4,280

Median for Neurology: 833

Drug cost

$613,640

Median for Neurology: $202,670

Branded share of claims

25.8%

Median for Neurology: 25.9%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Octagam Immun Globg(Igg)/Malt/Iga Ov50 Brand 16 $158,503
Ingrezza Valbenazine Tosylate Brand 12 $118,219
Rytary Carbidopa/Levodopa Brand 47 $45,254
Nurtec Odt Rimegepant Sulfate Brand 27 $43,676
Aimovig Autoinjector Erenumab-Aooe Brand 31 $32,723
Memantine Hcl Generic 486 $18,768
Ajovy Autoinjector Fremanezumab-Vfrm Brand 25 $17,352
Emgality Pen Galcanezumab-Gnlm Brand 20 $16,499
Carbidopa-Levodopa Er Carbidopa/Levodopa Brand 170 $15,482
Brilinta Ticagrelor Brand 18 $14,927

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 68 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 13,695 Part D prescribers listed as Neurology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 34 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$587,658

Of which drugs: $47,424

Medicare patients

1,030

Average age 76

Services billed

15,122

576 women, 454 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 58%
Depression 33%
Diabetes 32%
Ischemic heart disease 32%
Chronic kidney disease 25%
Alzheimer's or dementia 25%
Atrial fibrillation 23%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, onabotulinumtoxina, 1 unit J0585 Office 21 9,925 $47,424

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 39 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
Apokyn
$395 — —
QULIPTA
$366 — —
UBRELVY
$294 11 —
VALTOCO
$203 — —
Leqembi
$150 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 39 with Patron

Records

1,073 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Neurology in California

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record