Nurse Practitioner Program year 2025 Reported 2021–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Tracy Perry

Nurse Practitioner Lawrenceville, GA Nurse Practitioner

NPI 1295137651 CMS profile 10574446

771 Old Norcross Rd Ste 200, Lawrenceville, GA 30046

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$13,863

563 records reported · program years 2021–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2021–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Tracy Perry of Lawrenceville, GA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $13,863 across 563 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 98th percentile of Nurse Practitioner profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

5 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $2,724 92
2024 General $3,149 121
2023 General $3,081 132
2022 General $2,172 121
2021 General $2,737 97

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Tracy Perry
  • Nurse Practitioner median
  • Middle half of Nurse Practitioner
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Tracy Perry were reported at $2,724. Among 41,044 Nurse Practitioner profiles paid that year, the median was $174 and the middle half received between $55 and $557.

Show as a table
Year Tracy Perry Nurse Practitioner median Middle half National median
2019 $0 $50 $22–$97 $163
2020 $0 $40 $16–$108 $114
2021 $2,737 $135 $40–$426 $132
2022 $2,172 $152 $48–$470 $149
2023 $3,081 $166 $54–$529 $160
2024 $3,149 $173 $55–$556 $164
2025 $2,724 $174 $55–$557 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. Novo Nordisk Inc $2,282 127 payments
  2. Abbott Laboratories $2,024 46 payments
  3. Lilly USA, LLC $1,361 90 payments
  4. Xeris Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $1,254 36 payments
  5. Intuitive Surgical, Inc. $1,128 8 payments
  6. Dexcom, Inc. $716 25 payments
  7. Tandem Diabetes Care, Inc. $470 17 payments
  8. Insulet Corporation $470 9 payments
  9. Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC $409 23 payments
  10. Amgen Inc. $332 13 payments
  11. Other $3,417 169 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $12,714 554 payments
  2. Travel and Lodging $1,128 8 payments
  3. Education $22 1 payment
Products named General payments · program years 2021–2025
  1. FreeStyle Libre 3 $1,787 31 payments
  2. Ozempic $1,499 97 payments
  3. Da Vinci Surgical System $1,128 8 payments
  4. RYBELSUS $1,120 82 payments
  5. GVOKE PFS $766 14 payments
  6. Dexcom G6 Transmitter $668 23 payments
  7. MOUNJARO $492 26 payments
  8. Omnipod $470 9 payments
  9. GVOKE HYPOPEN $464 21 payments
  10. t:slim X2 Insulin Pump with Control-IQ $456 16 payments
  11. Other $6,753 369 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 48 drugs

Part D claims

3,578

Median for Nurse Practitioner: 389

Drug cost

$2,069,738

Median for Nurse Practitioner: $21,885

Branded share of claims

60.9%

Median for Nurse Practitioner: 19.6%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 418 $703,030
Trulicity Dulaglutide Brand 106 $207,180
Tresiba Flextouch U-100 Insulin Degludec Brand 186 $179,788
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 111 $138,184
Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 113 $135,107
Tresiba Flextouch U-200 Insulin Degludec Brand 68 $122,647
Mounjaro Tirzepatide Brand 71 $113,427
Januvia Sitagliptin Phosphate Brand 55 $72,717
Toujeo Max Solostar Insulin Glargine,hum.Rec.Anlog Brand 35 $65,885
Novolog Flexpen Insulin Aspart Brand 102 $41,617

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 48 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 229,976 Part D prescribers listed as Nurse Practitioner; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 7 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$3,456

Medicare's payments for the services billed

Medicare patients

42

Average age 69

Services billed

92

22 women, 20 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
Diabetes 75%
High blood pressure 75%
Chronic kidney disease 40%
Arthritis 38%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 26 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
MOUNJARO
  • Lilly USA, LLC $135
$135 71 —
Wegovy
  • Novo Nordisk Inc $130
$130 — —
RYBELSUS
  • Novo Nordisk Inc $125
$125 24 —
Ozempic
  • Novo Nordisk Inc $120
$120 418 —
JARDIANCE
  • Lilly USA, LLC $90
  • Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $26
$115 111 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 26 with Patron

Records

563 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Nurse Practitioner in Georgia

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record