Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Tomas Antonini

Urogynecology and Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery Austin, TX Medical Doctor

NPI 1265494827 CMS profile 239294

3407 Glenview Ave, Austin, TX 78703

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$183,345

581 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$818

Paid to them · 1 record reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Tomas Antonini of Austin, TX is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $183,345 across 581 general payments and $818 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 98th percentile of Urogynecology and Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

8 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $29,829 122
2024 General $25,089 95
2023 General $5,825 83
2022 General $20,882 70
2021 General $24,979 84
2020 General $41,963 71
2019 General $34,778 56
2019 Research $818 1

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Tomas Antonini
  • Urogynecology and Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery median
  • Middle half of Urogynecology and Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Tomas Antonini were reported at $29,829. Among 802 Urogynecology and Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery profiles paid that year, the median was $412 and the middle half received between $133 and $1,300.

Show as a table
Year Tomas Antonini Urogynecology and Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery median Middle half National median
2019 $34,778 $358 $132–$1,270 $163
2020 $41,963 $198 $86–$642 $114
2021 $24,979 $361 $118–$1,182 $132
2022 $20,882 $410 $128–$1,175 $149
2023 $5,825 $434 $152–$1,344 $160
2024 $25,089 $494 $193–$1,331 $164
2025 $29,829 $412 $133–$1,300 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Coloplast Corp $136,434 168 payments
  2. Intuitive Surgical, Inc. $25,117 15 payments
  3. Ethicon Inc. $6,500 23 payments
  4. Axonics Modulation Technologies, Inc. $3,967 50 payments
  5. Medtronic, Inc. $2,456 32 payments
  6. Caldera Medical, Inc $1,399 9 payments
  7. Allergan Inc. $1,294 37 payments
  8. AbbVie, Inc. $1,198 59 payments
  9. Sumitomo Pharma America, Inc. $1,133 88 payments
  10. Ethicon Endo-Surgery Inc. $550 1 payment
  11. Other $3,295 99 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Education $93,636 33 payments
  2. Consulting Fee $48,867 37 payments
  3. Food and Beverage $20,611 463 payments
  4. Travel and Lodging $19,449 46 payments
  5. Gift $601 1 payment
  6. Entertainment $181 1 payment
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Altis Women's Health $66,097 92 payments
  2. ALTIS Female Incontinence $55,607 45 payments
  3. Da Vinci Surgical System $25,117 15 payments
  4. Titan $12,074 2 payments
  5. Axonics $2,695 34 payments
  6. Bulkamid $2,329 22 payments
  7. INTERSTIM $1,570 25 payments
  8. Desara $1,399 9 payments
  9. Axonics r-SNM System $1,249 15 payments
  10. FEMALE INCONTINENCE $927 8 payments
  11. Other $9,583 331 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Research payments came from Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Coloplast Corp $818 1 payment

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 6 drugs

Part D claims

316

Median for Obstetrics & Gynecology: 65

Drug cost

$41,871

Median for Obstetrics & Gynecology: $3,585

Branded share of claims

72.2%

Median for Obstetrics & Gynecology: 25.1%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Gemtesa Vibegron Brand 25 $21,661
Myrbetriq Mirabegron Brand 11 $13,685
Nitrofurantoin Mono-Macro Nitrofurantoin Monohyd/M-Cryst Brand 125 $2,873
Estradiol Generic 40 $2,617
Cephalexin Generic 48 $643
Oxycodone-Acetaminophen Oxycodone Hcl/Acetaminophen Brand 67 $391

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 24,311 Part D prescribers listed as Obstetrics & Gynecology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 52 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$246,740

Of which drugs: $10,985

Medicare patients

226

Average age 74

Services billed

4,043

226 women, 0 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 58%
Arthritis 49%
Osteoporosis 26%
Diabetes 21%
Ischemic heart disease 21%
Depression 21%
Chronic kidney disease 13%
Cancer 11%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, onabotulinumtoxina, 1 unit J0585 Office 13 2,200 $10,985

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

5 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
GEMTESA
  • Sumitomo Pharma America, Inc. $193
$193 25 —
BOTOX
  • AbbVie, Inc. $165
$165 — 2,200
MYFEMBREE
  • Sumitomo Pharma America, Inc. $151
$151 — —
Veozah
  • Astellas Pharma US Inc $62
$62 — —
INTRAROSA
  • MILLICENT US INC $38
$38 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

Records

582 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Urogynecology and Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery in Texas

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record