Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Todd Fennell

Internal Medicine Greer, SC Medical Doctor

NPI 1083639884 CMS profile 185341

325 Medical Pkwy Ste 200, Greer, SC 29650

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$11,076

736 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Todd Fennell of Greer, SC is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $11,076 across 736 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 95th percentile of Internal Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $2,386 155
2024 General $2,443 170
2023 General $2,380 158
2022 General $1,017 65
2021 General $446 29
2020 General $649 39
2019 General $1,754 120

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Todd Fennell
  • Internal Medicine median
  • Middle half of Internal Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Todd Fennell were reported at $2,386. Among 52,115 Internal Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $156 and the middle half received between $47 and $551.

Show as a table
Year Todd Fennell Internal Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $1,754 $159 $48–$570 $163
2020 $649 $119 $33–$402 $114
2021 $446 $135 $37–$521 $132
2022 $1,017 $141 $42–$496 $149
2023 $2,380 $149 $45–$519 $160
2024 $2,443 $154 $47–$537 $164
2025 $2,386 $156 $47–$551 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Novo Nordisk Inc $1,647 98 payments
  2. AbbVie, Inc. $1,125 93 payments
  3. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $935 49 payments
  4. Pfizer Inc. $747 77 payments
  5. Lilly USA, LLC $740 60 payments
  6. Amgen Inc. $663 46 payments
  7. Abbott Laboratories $648 36 payments
  8. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $404 24 payments
  9. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $395 27 payments
  10. Astellas Pharma US Inc $394 22 payments
  11. Other $3,379 204 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $11,076 736 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Ozempic $1,010 60 payments
  2. RYBELSUS $772 46 payments
  3. FARXIGA $639 34 payments
  4. Tresiba $548 26 payments
  5. UBRELVY $480 46 payments
  6. FreeStyle Libre 3 $458 25 payments
  7. QULIPTA $436 40 payments
  8. JARDIANCE $382 21 payments
  9. BREZTRI $318 8 payments
  10. NURTEC ODT $312 36 payments
  11. Other $9,685 670 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 119 drugs

Part D claims

5,761

Median for Internal Medicine: 777

Drug cost

$506,729

Median for Internal Medicine: $73,373

Branded share of claims

21.7%

Median for Internal Medicine: 19.3%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 104 $137,642
Mounjaro Tirzepatide Brand 41 $66,267
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 42 $51,355
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 33 $41,787
Tresiba Flextouch U-200 Insulin Degludec Brand 33 $23,971
Xarelto Rivaroxaban Brand 21 $20,619
Trelegy Ellipta Fluticasone/Umeclidin/Vilanter Brand 21 $13,310
Trulicity Dulaglutide Brand 14 $12,879
Breztri Aerosphere Budesonide/Glycopyr/Formoterol Brand 15 $10,558
Repatha Sureclick Evolocumab Brand 17 $10,208

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 119 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 104,182 Part D prescribers listed as Internal Medicine; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 38 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$170,910

Of which drugs: $15,276

Medicare patients

320

Average age 75

Services billed

3,484

120 women, 200 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 39%
Ischemic heart disease 28%
Diabetes 27%
Chronic kidney disease 21%
Atrial fibrillation 18%
Depression 18%
Cancer 14%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Pcv20 vaccine im 90677 Office 36 36 $10,359
Vaccine for influenza for injection into muscle 90662 Office 58 60 $4,880

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 44 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
VRAYLAR
$156 — —
JARDIANCE
$150 42 —
BREZTRI
$110 15 —
UBRELVY
$108 — —
MOUNJARO
$101 41 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 44 with Patron

Records

736 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Internal Medicine in South Carolina

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record