Doctor of Osteopathy Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Toby Fugate

Infectious Disease Charleston, SC Doctor of Osteopathy

NPI 1295870186 CMS profile 13806

1481 Tobias Gadson Blvd Ste 1, Charleston, SC 29407

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$136,254

332 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$30,093 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2023–2025

Through program year 2025, Toby Fugate of Charleston, SC is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $136,254 across 332 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $30,093 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 97th percentile of Infectious Disease profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $53,927 95
2024 General $23,386 56
2023 General $18,289 54
2022 General $13,913 56
2021 General $10,081 44
2020 General $11,643 11
2019 General $5,014 16

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Toby Fugate
  • Infectious Disease median
  • Middle half of Infectious Disease
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Toby Fugate were reported at $53,927. Among 3,905 Infectious Disease profiles paid that year, the median was $188 and the middle half received between $57 and $766.

Show as a table
Year Toby Fugate Infectious Disease median Middle half National median
2019 $5,014 $190 $60–$862 $163
2020 $11,643 $124 $32–$606 $114
2021 $10,081 $148 $38–$905 $132
2022 $13,913 $166 $50–$834 $149
2023 $18,289 $171 $57–$787 $160
2024 $23,386 $176 $52–$752 $164
2025 $53,927 $188 $57–$766 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Gilead Sciences, Inc. $114,878 227 payments
  2. ViiV Healthcare Company $17,977 71 payments
  3. Theratechnologies Inc. $3,000 12 payments
  4. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation $116 7 payments
  5. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $109 7 payments
  6. Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC $59 3 payments
  7. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $32 1 payment
  8. Abbott Laboratories $23 1 payment
  9. Hologic, LLC $22 1 payment
  10. Novo Nordisk Inc $20 1 payment
  11. Other $19 1 payment

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $94,572 47 payments
  2. Consulting Fee $22,180 9 payments
  3. Travel and Lodging $11,730 67 payments
  4. Food and Beverage $7,772 209 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Descovy $47,162 72 payments
  2. Biktarvy $39,926 60 payments
  3. Yeztugo $21,396 26 payments
  4. DOVATO $12,399 31 payments
  5. TROGARZO $903 7 payments
  6. CABENUVA Hiv $300 17 payments
  7. RUKOBIA $227 5 payments
  8. EGRIFTA $204 8 payments
  9. CABENUVA Hiv $191 4 payments
  10. SYMTUZA $146 9 payments
  11. Other $628 34 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 34 drugs

Part D claims

1,839

Median for Infectious Disease: 268

Drug cost

$3,323,020

Median for Infectious Disease: $217,595

Branded share of claims

56.2%

Median for Infectious Disease: 45.5%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Biktarvy Bictegrav/Emtricit/Tenofov Ala Brand 424 $1,631,126
Juluca Dolutegravir/Rilpivirine Brand 103 $350,300
Triumeq Abacavir/Dolutegravir/Lamivudi Brand 83 $299,776
Tivicay Dolutegravir Sodium Brand 113 $273,217
Genvoya Elviteg/Cob/Emtri/Tenof Alafen Brand 59 $232,864
Descovy Emtricitabine/Tenofov Alafenam Brand 91 $193,413
Odefsey Emtricitab/Rilpiviri/Tenof Ala Brand 52 $183,139
Dovato Dolutegravir Sodium/Lamivudine Brand 19 $53,011
Prezcobix Darunavir/Cobicistat Brand 21 $49,319
Darunavir Generic 38 $48,637

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 34 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 5,546 Part D prescribers listed as Infectious Disease; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 14 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$5,519

Medicare's payments for the services billed

Medicare patients

25

Average age 64

Services billed

436

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Depression 48%
Osteoporosis 0%
Alzheimer's or dementia 0%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 12 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
Biktarvy
  • Gilead Sciences, Inc. $12,230
$12,230 424 —
Descovy
  • Gilead Sciences, Inc. $10,437
$10,437 91 —
EGRIFTA SV
  • Theratechnologies Inc. $46
$46 — —
CABENUVA
  • ViiV Healthcare Company $37
$37 — —
APRETUDE
  • ViiV Healthcare Company $35
$35 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 12 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

332 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record