Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Timothy Nickel

Allergy Tulsa, OK Medical Doctor

NPI 1154302354 CMS profile 96984

9311 S Mingo Rd, Tulsa, OK 74133

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$51,455

441 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Timothy Nickel of Tulsa, OK is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $51,455 across 441 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 91st percentile of Allergy profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $7,754 125
2024 General $18,054 89
2023 General $6,131 98
2022 General $4,456 23
2021 General $2,327 4
2020 General $220 13
2019 General $12,513 89

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Timothy Nickel
  • Allergy median
  • Middle half of Allergy
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Timothy Nickel were reported at $7,754. Among 526 Allergy profiles paid that year, the median was $1,143 and the middle half received between $226 and $2,504.

Show as a table
Year Timothy Nickel Allergy median Middle half National median
2019 $12,513 $506 $151–$1,337 $163
2020 $220 $409 $108–$1,162 $114
2021 $2,327 $549 $125–$1,485 $132
2022 $4,456 $666 $161–$1,594 $149
2023 $6,131 $780 $186–$1,916 $160
2024 $18,054 $1,031 $271–$2,196 $164
2025 $7,754 $1,143 $226–$2,504 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Pharming Healthcare, Inc. $19,688 50 payments
  2. Genentech USA, Inc. $16,292 57 payments
  3. Shire North American Group Inc $4,075 15 payments
  4. BioCryst Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $3,233 7 payments
  5. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $1,433 59 payments
  6. Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc. $1,237 6 payments
  7. Genzyme Corporation $1,042 41 payments
  8. Blueprint Medicines Corporation $785 25 payments
  9. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $753 51 payments
  10. Regeneron Healthcare Solutions, Inc. $424 18 payments
  11. Other $2,494 112 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $12,900 5 payments
  2. Consulting Fee $11,953 4 payments
  3. Honoraria $10,850 4 payments
  4. Food and Beverage $9,366 401 payments
  5. Travel and Lodging $6,085 23 payments
  6. Education $301 4 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. RUCONEST $19,688 50 payments
  2. Xolair $16,405 57 payments
  3. TAKHZYRO $3,871 3 payments
  4. DUPIXENT Immunology $1,218 40 payments
  5. FASENRA $541 14 payments
  6. AYVAKIT $538 19 payments
  7. BEVESPI AEROSPHERE $523 12 payments
  8. TEZSPIRE $469 10 payments
  9. AIRSUPRA $368 5 payments
  10. DUPIXENT Inflammation And Immunology $347 15 payments
  11. Other $4,199 226 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 32 drugs

Part D claims

1,401

Median for Internal Medicine: 777

Drug cost

$2,561,554

Median for Internal Medicine: $73,373

Branded share of claims

45.4%

Median for Internal Medicine: 19.3%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Takhzyro Lanadelumab-Flyo Brand 33 $1,703,152
Icatibant Icatibant Acetate Brand 12 $408,448
Dupixent Pen Dupilumab Brand 31 $120,729
Trelegy Ellipta Fluticasone/Umeclidin/Vilanter Brand 98 $84,491
Xolair Omalizumab Brand 25 $68,162
Dupixent Syringe Dupilumab Brand 13 $47,583
Breo Ellipta Fluticasone/Vilanterol Brand 87 $36,160
Epinephrine Generic 114 $20,570
Spiriva Respimat Tiotropium Bromide Brand 23 $13,021
Symbicort Budesonide/Formoterol Fumarate Brand 35 $9,408

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 32 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 104,182 Part D prescribers listed as Internal Medicine; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 52 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$567,534

Of which drugs: $488,149

Medicare patients

715

Average age 72

Services billed

25,406

475 women, 240 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 70%
Arthritis 52%
Ischemic heart disease 23%
Depression 23%
Diabetes 21%
COPD 17%
Osteoporosis 16%
Chronic kidney disease 15%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, omalizumab, 5 mg J2357 Office 26 6,810 $202,250
Injection, immune globulin, (gammagard liquid), non-lyophilized, (e.g., liquid), 500 mg J1569 Office 17 3,900 $136,208
Vaccine for influenza for injection into muscle 90662 Office 16 16 $1,307
5% dextrose/water (500 ml = 1 unit) J7060 Office 11 43 $61

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 16 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
XOLAIR
  • Genentech USA, Inc. $10,282
  • Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $65
$10,347 25 6,810
RUCONEST
  • Pharming Healthcare, Inc. $4,827
$4,827 — —
DUPIXENT
  • GENZYME CORPORATION $353
  • SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S. LLC $79
  • Regeneron Healthcare Solutions, Inc. $71
$502 44 —
AYVAKIT
  • Blueprint Medicines Corporation $349
$349 — —
FASENRA
  • AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $162
$162 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 16 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

441 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Allergy in Oklahoma

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record