Who Paid My Doc
Timothy McCay
Diagnostic Radiology Tulsa, OK Doctor of Osteopathy
NPI 1245221761 CMS profile 540809
744 W 9Th St, Tulsa, OK 74127
General payments
$678
Research payments
$0
Ownership & investment interest
$0
Through program year 2021, Timothy McCay of Tulsa, OK is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $678 across 40 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.
No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.
General payments for this record sit in the 75th percentile of Diagnostic Radiology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.
By program year
3 rows| Year | Kind | Relative to this record's peak year | Amount | Records |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | General | $60 | 4 | |
| 2020 | General | $273 | 15 | |
| 2019 | General | $345 | 21 |
Beside peers
- Timothy McCay
- Diagnostic Radiology median
- Middle half of Diagnostic Radiology
- National median
In program year 2025, general payments to Timothy McCay were reported at $0. Among 8,325 Diagnostic Radiology profiles paid that year, the median was $112 and the middle half received between $32 and $349.
Show as a table
| Year | Timothy McCay | Diagnostic Radiology median | Middle half | National median |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | $345 | $108 | $29–$318 | $163 |
| 2020 | $273 | $65 | $21–$252 | $114 |
| 2021 | $60 | $92 | $24–$292 | $132 |
| 2022 | $0 | $104 | $29–$294 | $149 |
| 2023 | $0 | $110 | $29–$337 | $160 |
| 2024 | $0 | $113 | $30–$356 | $164 |
| 2025 | $0 | $112 | $32–$349 | $169 |
Breakdown
A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.
Billing to Medicare
Part B · data year 2024 · 161 billing codesPaid by Medicare
$148,755
Medicare patients
3,184
Services billed
4,752
| Condition among their Medicare patients | Relative to the most common | Share of patients |
|---|---|---|
| High blood pressure | 75% | |
| Arthritis | 56% | |
| Ischemic heart disease | 42% | |
| Diabetes | 41% | |
| Chronic kidney disease | 35% | |
| COPD | 33% | |
| Heart failure | 32% | |
| Depression | 32% |
Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.
Records
40 reportedEvery payment, record by record
Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.
Other Diagnostic Radiology in Oklahoma
Douglas Beall
Diagnostic Radiology · Edmond, OK
Bryan Vanzandt
Diagnostic Radiology · Oklahoma City, OK
Derrick Wagoner
Diagnostic Radiology · Edmond, OK
Jonathan Cross
Diagnostic Radiology · Tulsa, OK
Anthony Alleman
Diagnostic Radiology · Oklahoma City, OK
James Webb
Diagnostic Radiology · Tulsa, OK
Related records
Diagnostic Radiology in Oklahoma
Practitioners in the same specialty and state, ranked by reported value.
All Diagnostic Radiology
Everyone recorded under this specialty, nationwide.
Doctors in Oklahoma
Every practitioner in the state with a reported payment.
How to read this page
What each amount means, and what it does not mean.
What this means
U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.
An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.
Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.