Doctor of Osteopathy Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Thomas Walsh

Internal Medicine Bradenton, FL Doctor of Osteopathy

NPI 1942664685 CMS profile 5706133

3007 Manatee Ave W, Bradenton, FL 34205

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$12,784

575 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Thomas Walsh of Bradenton, FL is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $12,784 across 575 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 95th percentile of Internal Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $2,602 124
2024 General $2,516 132
2023 General $2,333 124
2022 General $1,939 99
2021 General $2,000 46
2020 General $940 36
2019 General $454 14

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Thomas Walsh
  • Internal Medicine median
  • Middle half of Internal Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Thomas Walsh were reported at $2,602. Among 52,115 Internal Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $156 and the middle half received between $47 and $551.

Show as a table
Year Thomas Walsh Internal Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $454 $159 $48–$570 $163
2020 $940 $119 $33–$402 $114
2021 $2,000 $135 $37–$521 $132
2022 $1,939 $141 $42–$496 $149
2023 $2,333 $149 $45–$519 $160
2024 $2,516 $154 $47–$537 $164
2025 $2,602 $156 $47–$551 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $1,344 62 payments
  2. Biohaven Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $1,299 6 payments
  3. Novo Nordisk Inc $953 48 payments
  4. Lilly USA, LLC $927 58 payments
  5. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $848 38 payments
  6. Amgen Inc. $750 44 payments
  7. Pfizer Inc. $653 46 payments
  8. ViiV Healthcare Company $646 22 payments
  9. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $644 35 payments
  10. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $561 24 payments
  11. Other $4,160 192 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $11,584 574 payments
  2. Consulting Fee $1,200 1 payment
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. NURTEC ODT $1,457 13 payments
  2. TRELEGY ELLIPTA $631 34 payments
  3. FARXIGA $576 21 payments
  4. LEQVIO $507 21 payments
  5. Repatha $504 25 payments
  6. VRAYLAR $500 20 payments
  7. Otezla $468 32 payments
  8. RYBELSUS $459 24 payments
  9. DOVATO $459 18 payments
  10. UBRELVY $456 23 payments
  11. Other $9,073 486 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 104 drugs

Part D claims

4,833

Median for Internal Medicine: 777

Drug cost

$596,188

Median for Internal Medicine: $73,373

Branded share of claims

19.2%

Median for Internal Medicine: 19.3%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 100 $142,104
Mounjaro Tirzepatide Brand 51 $98,862
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 67 $86,895
Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 37 $55,740
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 27 $43,071
Trelegy Ellipta Fluticasone/Umeclidin/Vilanter Brand 32 $38,021
Repatha Sureclick Evolocumab Brand 21 $22,708
Xarelto Rivaroxaban Brand 19 $21,524
Trulicity Dulaglutide Brand 14 $17,030
Incruse Ellipta Umeclidinium Bromide Brand 11 $6,880

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 104 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 104,182 Part D prescribers listed as Internal Medicine; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 48 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$167,477

Of which drugs: $26,385

Medicare patients

421

Average age 74

Services billed

3,641

245 women, 176 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 48%
Ischemic heart disease 32%
Depression 30%
Diabetes 26%
Chronic kidney disease 24%
Atrial fibrillation 20%
Osteoporosis 18%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, denosumab, 1 mg J0897 Office 17 1,261 $25,907
Injection, triamcinolone acetonide, not otherwise specified, 10 mg J3301 Office 20 162 $119

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 36 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
TRELEGY ELLIPTA
  • GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $188
$188 32 —
VRAYLAR
  • AbbVie, Inc. $144
$144 — —
LEQVIO
  • Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $142
$142 — —
FARXIGA
  • AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $131
$131 37 —
NURTEC ODT
  • PFIZER INC. $121
$121 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 36 with Patron

Records

575 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Internal Medicine in Florida

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record