Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Thomas Romano

Rheumatology Los Angeles, CA Medical Doctor

NPI 1023031184 CMS profile 137312

1701 E Cesar E Chavez Ave, Suite #510, Los Angeles, CA 90033

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$130,985

805 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Thomas Romano of Los Angeles, CA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $130,985 across 805 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 94th percentile of Rheumatology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

6 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $450 2
2023 General $150 1
2022 General $36,693 228
2021 General $24,595 195
2020 General $16,722 128
2019 General $52,375 251

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Thomas Romano
  • Rheumatology median
  • Middle half of Rheumatology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Thomas Romano were reported at $450. Among 4,454 Rheumatology profiles paid that year, the median was $903 and the middle half received between $171 and $2,775.

Show as a table
Year Thomas Romano Rheumatology median Middle half National median
2019 $52,375 $744 $153–$2,687 $163
2020 $16,722 $462 $98–$2,027 $114
2021 $24,595 $531 $101–$2,153 $132
2022 $36,693 $627 $125–$2,303 $149
2023 $150 $741 $145–$2,524 $160
2024 $0 $830 $166–$2,660 $164
2025 $450 $903 $171–$2,775 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $73,031 201 payments
  2. Amgen Inc. $39,063 136 payments
  3. Celgene Corporation $10,497 40 payments
  4. UCB, Inc. $1,859 28 payments
  5. Horizon Therapeutics plc $822 68 payments
  6. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $817 43 payments
  7. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $685 46 payments
  8. Mallinckrodt Hospital Products Inc. $473 23 payments
  9. Fidia Pharma USA Inc. $438 40 payments
  10. Actelion Pharmaceuticals US, Inc. $401 31 payments
  11. Other $2,900 149 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $99,618 61 payments
  2. Food and Beverage $14,065 688 payments
  3. Consulting Fee $10,153 9 payments
  4. Travel and Lodging $7,140 46 payments
  5. Education $9 1 payment
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. RINVOQ Immunology $52,535 140 payments
  2. Otezla Inflammation $14,310 72 payments
  3. Enbrel Inflammation $13,551 19 payments
  4. Otezla Dermatology $10,314 24 payments
  5. Enbrel Inflammation $9,192 64 payments
  6. SKYRIZI $7,705 25 payments
  7. RINVOQ Immunology $7,145 18 payments
  8. Otezla Inflammation $2,070 4 payments
  9. Enbrel Inflammation $928 12 payments
  10. BENLYSTA $767 42 payments
  11. Other $8,500 526 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 12 drugs

Part D claims

534

Median for Internal Medicine: 777

Drug cost

$120,845

Median for Internal Medicine: $73,373

Branded share of claims

0%

Median for Internal Medicine: 19.3%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Diflorasone Diacetate Generic 49 $40,731
Tacrolimus Generic 116 $37,029
Oxiconazole Nitrate Generic 50 $15,163
Tavaborole Generic 45 $10,997
Clobetasol Propionate Generic 62 $6,426
Ketoconazole Generic 62 $3,371
Fluocinonide Generic 28 $2,684
Clotrimazole Generic 49 $1,578
Halobetasol Propionate Generic 11 $946
Permethrin Generic 18 $913

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 12 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 104,182 Part D prescribers listed as Internal Medicine; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Records

805 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Rheumatology in California

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record