Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Thomas Pintar

Nephrology Boise, ID Medical Doctor

NPI 1952343352 CMS profile 88816

5610 W Gage St, Suite A, Boise, ID 83706

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$164

11 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Thomas Pintar of Boise, ID is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $164 across 11 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 19th percentile of Nephrology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

5 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $56 2
2024 General $6 2
2021 General $4 1
2020 General $21 1
2019 General $78 5

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Thomas Pintar
  • Nephrology median
  • Middle half of Nephrology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Thomas Pintar were reported at $56. Among 8,186 Nephrology profiles paid that year, the median was $310 and the middle half received between $104 and $880.

Show as a table
Year Thomas Pintar Nephrology median Middle half National median
2019 $78 $236 $90–$588 $163
2020 $21 $135 $46–$364 $114
2021 $4 $202 $67–$551 $132
2022 $0 $242 $77–$695 $149
2023 $0 $254 $84–$766 $160
2024 $6 $300 $99–$852 $164
2025 $56 $310 $104–$880 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Tandem Diabetes Care, Inc. $38 1 payment
  2. Otsuka America Pharmaceutical, Inc. $33 2 payments
  3. Genentech USA, Inc. $32 2 payments
  4. Relypsa, Inc. $21 1 payment
  5. Novo Nordisk Inc $18 1 payment
  6. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $12 1 payment
  7. Retrophin, Inc. $10 3 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $154 8 payments
  2. Education $10 3 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. t:slim X2 Insulin Pump with Control-IQ $38 1 payment
  2. JYNARQUE $33 2 payments
  3. Rituxan $32 2 payments
  4. Veltassa $21 1 payment
  5. Ozempic $18 1 payment
  6. AFINITOR $12 1 payment
  7. Thiola $4 1 payment

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 41 drugs

Part D claims

1,867

Median for Nephrology: 954

Drug cost

$327,672

Median for Nephrology: $127,050

Branded share of claims

17.2%

Median for Nephrology: 17.9%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 143 $154,430
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 68 $72,227
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 31 $23,563
Sevelamer Carbonate Generic 88 $21,830
Lokelma Sodium Zirconium Cyclosilicate Brand 13 $15,887
Cinacalcet Hcl Generic 23 $10,798
Prosol Parenteral Amino Acid 20% No.1 Brand 47 $7,241
Potassium Chloride Generic 74 $4,596
Calcium Acetate Generic 45 $3,166
Bumetanide Generic 22 $1,619

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 41 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 9,003 Part D prescribers listed as Nephrology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 23 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$174,923

Medicare's payments for the services billed

Medicare patients

417

Average age 71

Services billed

1,958

185 women, 232 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Chronic kidney disease 75%
Diabetes 53%
Arthritis 44%
Heart failure 40%
Ischemic heart disease 37%
Atrial fibrillation 32%
Depression 26%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Records

11 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record