Doctor of Osteopathy Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Thomas Leahey

Rheumatology Ardmore, OK Doctor of Osteopathy

NPI 1891886545 CMS profile 267272

2015 W Broadway St, Ste 2A, Ardmore, OK 73401

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$11,664

415 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Thomas Leahey of Ardmore, OK is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $11,664 across 415 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 75th percentile of Rheumatology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $1,795 62
2024 General $1,785 67
2023 General $1,787 76
2022 General $1,898 67
2021 General $1,304 50
2020 General $1,055 40
2019 General $2,039 53

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Thomas Leahey
  • Rheumatology median
  • Middle half of Rheumatology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Thomas Leahey were reported at $1,795. Among 4,454 Rheumatology profiles paid that year, the median was $903 and the middle half received between $171 and $2,775.

Show as a table
Year Thomas Leahey Rheumatology median Middle half National median
2019 $2,039 $744 $153–$2,687 $163
2020 $1,055 $462 $98–$2,027 $114
2021 $1,304 $531 $101–$2,153 $132
2022 $1,898 $627 $125–$2,303 $149
2023 $1,787 $741 $145–$2,524 $160
2024 $1,785 $830 $166–$2,660 $164
2025 $1,795 $903 $171–$2,775 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $2,032 71 payments
  2. Amgen Inc. $1,315 55 payments
  3. UCB, Inc. $1,308 52 payments
  4. AbbVie, Inc. $1,232 62 payments
  5. Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC $1,127 10 payments
  6. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $1,074 27 payments
  7. Horizon Therapeutics plc $775 39 payments
  8. Lilly USA, LLC $583 26 payments
  9. E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $507 20 payments
  10. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $290 6 payments
  11. Other $1,421 47 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $11,464 410 payments
  2. Education $200 5 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. SAPHNELO $2,002 69 payments
  2. SIMPONI ARIA $1,877 32 payments
  3. STELARA $1,531 20 payments
  4. TREMFYA $1,184 22 payments
  5. Cimzia $1,000 43 payments
  6. KRYSTEXXA $750 38 payments
  7. EVENITY $688 23 payments
  8. RINVOQ $574 36 payments
  9. ORENCIA $507 20 payments
  10. TALTZ $466 24 payments
  11. Other $3,997 158 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 33 drugs

Part D claims

3,371

Median for Rheumatology: 1,511

Drug cost

$536,476

Median for Rheumatology: $1,139,948

Branded share of claims

19%

Median for Rheumatology: 28.8%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Orencia Clickject Abatacept Brand 33 $179,680
Enbrel Sureclick Etanercept Brand 13 $95,773
Simponi Golimumab Brand 13 $77,824
Humira Pen Adalimumab Brand 11 $71,781
Leucovorin Calcium Generic 509 $31,751
Prolia Denosumab Brand 13 $23,061
Leflunomide Generic 317 $18,087
Hydroxychloroquine Sulfate Generic 503 $12,208
Methotrexate Methotrexate Sodium Brand 454 $7,432
Celecoxib Generic 180 $3,005

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 33 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 5,224 Part D prescribers listed as Rheumatology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 54 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$994,188

Of which drugs: $838,746

Medicare patients

404

Average age 72

Services billed

64,431

314 women, 90 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 75%
Ischemic heart disease 30%
Chronic kidney disease 24%
Osteoporosis 24%
Depression 23%
Diabetes 22%
COPD 19%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, abatacept, 10 mg (code may be used for medicare when drug administered under the direct supervision of a physician, not for use when drug is self administered) J0129 Office 14 8,100 $265,486
Injection, golimumab, 1 mg, for intravenous use J1602 Office 31 26,017 $234,020
Injection, denosumab, 1 mg J0897 Office 18 1,622 $33,586
Injection, triamcinolone acetonide, not otherwise specified, 10 mg J3301 Office 18 145 $90

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 19 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
SAPHNELO
  • AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $633
$633 — —
RINVOQ
  • AbbVie, Inc. $152
$152 — —
Bimzelx
  • UCB, Inc. $146
$146 — —
KRYSTEXXA
  • Amgen Inc. $140
$140 — —
SIMPONI ARIA
  • Janssen Biotech, Inc. $122
$122 13 26,017

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 19 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

415 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record