Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Thomas Larkin

Pain Medicine Hagerstown, MD Medical Doctor

NPI 1043318587 CMS profile 1595

17 Western Maryland Pkwy, 100, Hagerstown, MD 21740

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$4,999

184 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$8,166 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2021–2024

Through program year 2025, Thomas Larkin of Hagerstown, MD is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $4,999 across 184 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $8,166 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 66th percentile of Pain Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $568 26
2024 General $673 29
2023 General $587 22
2022 General $883 32
2021 General $551 18
2020 General $687 19
2019 General $1,050 38

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Thomas Larkin
  • Pain Medicine median
  • Middle half of Pain Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Thomas Larkin were reported at $568. Among 2,779 Pain Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $458 and the middle half received between $124 and $1,401.

Show as a table
Year Thomas Larkin Pain Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $1,050 $498 $126–$1,682 $163
2020 $687 $284 $80–$910 $114
2021 $551 $399 $112–$1,219 $132
2022 $883 $455 $137–$1,484 $149
2023 $587 $484 $128–$1,495 $160
2024 $673 $498 $131–$1,540 $164
2025 $568 $458 $124–$1,401 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Abbott Laboratories $1,006 48 payments
  2. Boston Scientific Corporation $752 20 payments
  3. Nevro Corp. $653 11 payments
  4. Medtronic USA, Inc. $363 7 payments
  5. Collegium Pharmaceutical, Inc. $335 19 payments
  6. SI-BONE, Inc. $235 4 payments
  7. AbbVie, Inc. $203 9 payments
  8. TerSera Therapeutics LLC $181 9 payments
  9. Amgen Inc. $131 2 payments
  10. Medtronic, Inc. $128 7 payments
  11. Other $1,013 48 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $4,999 184 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. GENERAL PAIN MANAGEMENT $329 4 payments
  2. INTELLIS $326 6 payments
  3. WaveWriter Alpha Prime 16 $312 10 payments
  4. PROCLAIM $290 12 payments
  5. Omnia $265 4 payments
  6. Senza $245 4 payments
  7. XTAMPZA $227 13 payments
  8. IFUSE IMPLANT $172 2 payments
  9. ETERNA $158 8 payments
  10. BOTOX $154 6 payments
  11. Other $2,873 139 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 13 drugs

Part D claims

211

Median for Interventional Pain Management: 1,220

Drug cost

$11,977

Median for Interventional Pain Management: $39,344

Branded share of claims

13.3%

Median for Interventional Pain Management: 34.8%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Aimovig Autoinjector Erenumab-Aooe Brand 11 $6,464
Lidocaine Generic 13 $1,588
Tizanidine Hcl Generic 14 $772
Gabapentin Generic 35 $729
Pregabalin Generic 11 $543
Baclofen Generic 20 $507
Buprenorphine Hcl Generic 13 $414
Oxycodone-Acetaminophen Oxycodone Hcl/Acetaminophen Brand 17 $371
Celecoxib Generic 12 $197
Oxycodone Hcl Generic 11 $134

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 13 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 1,476 Part D prescribers listed as Interventional Pain Management; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 59 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$347,873

Of which drugs: $3,328

Medicare patients

657

Average age 76

Services billed

6,343

439 women, 218 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 75%
Osteoporosis 29%
Depression 28%
Ischemic heart disease 27%
Diabetes 23%
Chronic kidney disease 17%
Cancer 16%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, methylprednisolone acetate, 80 mg J1040 Office 26 34 $238
Injection, methylprednisolone acetate, 1 mg J1010 Office 99 1,165 $117
Low osmolar contrast material, 300-399 mg/ml iodine concentration, per ml Q9967 Office 109 531 $54

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 6 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
Prialt
  • TerSera Therapeutics LLC $53
$53 — —
SUBLOCADE
  • Indivior Inc. $41
$41 — —
BELBUCA
  • Collegium Pharmaceutical, Inc. $39
$39 — —
XTAMPZA
  • Collegium Pharmaceutical, Inc. $33
$33 — —
UBRELVY
  • AbbVie, Inc. $9
$9 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 6 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

184 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Pain Medicine in Maryland

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record