Doctor of Osteopathy Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Thomas Keller

Internal Medicine Hanover, PA Doctor of Osteopathy

NPI 1073587515 CMS profile 48153

250 Fame Ave, Suite 135, Hanover, PA 17331

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$18,018

1,163 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Thomas Keller of Hanover, PA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $18,018 across 1,163 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 97th percentile of Internal Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $2,892 150
2024 General $2,623 150
2023 General $2,572 166
2022 General $3,575 177
2021 General $2,576 189
2020 General $1,962 171
2019 General $1,819 160

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Thomas Keller
  • Internal Medicine median
  • Middle half of Internal Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Thomas Keller were reported at $2,892. Among 52,115 Internal Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $156 and the middle half received between $47 and $551.

Show as a table
Year Thomas Keller Internal Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $1,819 $159 $48–$570 $163
2020 $1,962 $119 $33–$402 $114
2021 $2,576 $135 $37–$521 $132
2022 $3,575 $141 $42–$496 $149
2023 $2,572 $149 $45–$519 $160
2024 $2,623 $154 $47–$537 $164
2025 $2,892 $156 $47–$551 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Novo Nordisk Inc $2,910 233 payments
  2. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $1,755 95 payments
  3. Pfizer Inc. $1,377 115 payments
  4. AbbVie, Inc. $1,331 96 payments
  5. Summit Surgical Corp. $1,200 1 payment
  6. Lilly USA, LLC $984 61 payments
  7. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $911 73 payments
  8. Astellas Pharma US Inc $698 35 payments
  9. Amarin Pharma Inc. $549 61 payments
  10. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $503 34 payments
  11. Other $5,801 359 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $16,553 1,153 payments
  2. Education $1,466 10 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Ozempic $2,141 179 payments
  2. RYBELSUS $1,764 142 payments
  3. FARXIGA $1,009 48 payments
  4. BREZTRI $630 27 payments
  5. ELIQUIS $619 52 payments
  6. TRELEGY ELLIPTA $535 43 payments
  7. Vascepa $469 56 payments
  8. QULIPTA $459 38 payments
  9. MOUNJARO $440 27 payments
  10. VRAYLAR $427 28 payments
  11. Other $14,503 958 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 245 drugs

Part D claims

35,605

Median for Internal Medicine: 777

Drug cost

$1,708,731

Median for Internal Medicine: $73,373

Branded share of claims

16.1%

Median for Internal Medicine: 19.3%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 934 $348,883
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 99 $125,131
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 103 $106,927
Januvia Sitagliptin Phosphate Brand 140 $104,491
Nuplazid Pimavanserin Tartrate Brand 17 $93,323
Xarelto Rivaroxaban Brand 127 $73,478
Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 45 $42,880
Prolia Denosumab Brand 26 $42,286
Tresiba Flextouch U-200 Insulin Degludec Brand 31 $37,127
Tresiba Flextouch U-100 Insulin Degludec Brand 51 $33,938

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 245 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 104,182 Part D prescribers listed as Internal Medicine; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 45 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$276,953

Of which drugs: $49,563

Medicare patients

796

Average age 81

Services billed

4,416

455 women, 341 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 52%
Diabetes 35%
Ischemic heart disease 33%
Depression 29%
Chronic kidney disease 26%
Atrial fibrillation 25%
Heart failure 22%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, denosumab, 1 mg J0897 Office 12 900 $17,013
Vaccine for influenza for injection into muscle 90653 Office 203 203 $15,856
Pcv20 vaccine im 90677 Office 54 54 $15,598
Influenza vaccine, trivalent derived from cell cultures 90661 Office 21 21 $755

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 37 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
RYBELSUS
$208 23 —
Ozempic
$208 99 —
FARXIGA
$166 45 —
AIRSUPRA
$164 — —
MOUNJARO
$129 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 37 with Patron

Records

1,163 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Internal Medicine in Pennsylvania

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record