Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Thomas Hughes

Mt. Pleasant, SC Medical Doctor

NPI 1831379213 CMS profile 218933

913 B Bowman Rd, Mt. Pleasant, SC 29464

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$101,603

1,701 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Thomas Hughes of Mt. Pleasant, SC is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $101,603 across 1,701 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $6,158 301
2024 General $5,079 261
2023 General $4,809 238
2022 General $17,338 234
2021 General $26,262 237
2020 General $27,339 227
2019 General $14,619 203

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Thomas Hughes
  • South Carolina median
  • Middle half of South Carolina
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Thomas Hughes were reported at $6,158. Among 17,818 South Carolina profiles paid that year, the median was $187 and the middle half received between $55 and $659.

Show as a table
Year Thomas Hughes South Carolina median Middle half National median
2019 $14,619 $198 $57–$705 $163
2020 $27,339 $123 $36–$406 $114
2021 $26,262 $151 $42–$514 $132
2022 $17,338 $166 $47–$606 $149
2023 $4,809 $188 $54–$641 $160
2024 $5,079 $182 $53–$645 $164
2025 $6,158 $187 $55–$659 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Lilly USA, LLC $28,527 110 payments
  2. Biogen, Inc. $20,315 128 payments
  3. Genzyme Corporation $12,891 50 payments
  4. Biohaven Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $10,003 17 payments
  5. Biohaven Pharmaceutical Holding Company Ltd. $4,033 10 payments
  6. EMD Serono, Inc. $2,041 111 payments
  7. AbbVie, Inc. $1,755 135 payments
  8. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $1,442 95 payments
  9. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. $1,361 87 payments
  10. Genentech USA, Inc. $1,051 63 payments
  11. Other $18,184 895 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $59,968 54 payments
  2. Food and Beverage $30,894 1,627 payments
  3. Consulting Fee $8,976 5 payments
  4. Travel and Lodging $1,587 8 payments
  5. Education $134 6 payments
  6. Grant $44 1 payment
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. TYSABRI $15,890 84 payments
  2. NURTEC ODT $14,036 27 payments
  3. EMGALITY $14,029 37 payments
  4. REYVOW $13,441 32 payments
  5. AUBAGIO Multiple Sclerosis $11,379 18 payments
  6. TECFIDERA $7,380 25 payments
  7. VUMERITY $1,928 45 payments
  8. AUBAGIO Neurology $1,258 19 payments
  9. UBRELVY $1,094 91 payments
  10. AIMOVIG $963 55 payments
  11. Other $25,113 1,360 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 58 drugs

Part D claims

3,957

Median for Neurology: 833

Drug cost

$606,793

Median for Neurology: $202,670

Branded share of claims

23.6%

Median for Neurology: 25.9%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Nuplazid Pimavanserin Tartrate Brand 21 $104,186
Zeposia Ozanimod Hydrochloride Brand 11 $97,788
Kesimpta Pen Ofatumumab Brand 11 $96,091
Ubrelvy Ubrogepant Brand 40 $60,762
Nuedexta Dextromethorphan Hbr/Quinidine Brand 23 $46,647
Nurtec Odt Rimegepant Sulfate Brand 31 $34,746
Ajovy Autoinjector Fremanezumab-Vfrm Brand 26 $20,604
Aimovig Autoinjector Erenumab-Aooe Brand 19 $19,984
Rytary Carbidopa/Levodopa Brand 23 $18,621
Memantine Hcl Generic 461 $12,878

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 58 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 13,695 Part D prescribers listed as Neurology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 53 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$1,418,485

Of which drugs: $1,087,067

Medicare patients

1,000

Average age 75

Services billed

201,317

544 women, 456 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 73%
Arthritis 55%
Depression 33%
Diabetes 29%
Ischemic heart disease 27%
Alzheimer's or dementia 25%
Chronic kidney disease 24%
Atrial fibrillation 20%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, lecanemab-irmb, 1 mg J0174 Office 17 145,860 $153,036
Injection, onabotulinumtoxina, 1 unit J0585 Office 60 25,970 $126,892

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 46 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
INGREZZA
$348 — —
BRIUMVI
$303 — —
NUPLAZID
$264 21 —
ULTOMIRIS
$259 — —
Austedo XR
$228 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 46 with Patron

Records

1,701 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record