Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Thomas Hope

Nuclear Radiology San Francisco, CA Medical Doctor

NPI 1093040123 CMS profile 3753

Ucsf Department Of Radiology, 505 Parnassus Avenue, M-391, San Francisco, CA 94143

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$105,303

101 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$3,051,451 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2020–2025

Through program year 2025, Thomas Hope of San Francisco, CA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $105,303 across 101 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $3,051,451 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 96th percentile of Nuclear Radiology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $27,994 31
2024 General $13,657 17
2023 General $8,033 13
2022 General $15,509 14
2021 General $12,815 3
2020 General $18,559 6
2019 General $8,737 17

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Thomas Hope
  • Nuclear Radiology median
  • Middle half of Nuclear Radiology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Thomas Hope were reported at $27,994. Among 103 Nuclear Radiology profiles paid that year, the median was $145 and the middle half received between $47 and $1,684.

Show as a table
Year Thomas Hope Nuclear Radiology median Middle half National median
2019 $8,737 $136 $49–$543 $163
2020 $18,559 $102 $32–$2,014 $114
2021 $12,815 $72 $25–$381 $132
2022 $15,509 $69 $25–$202 $149
2023 $8,033 $89 $28–$281 $160
2024 $13,657 $133 $40–$829 $164
2025 $27,994 $145 $47–$1,684 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Curium US LLC $31,199 24 payments
  2. E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $18,674 20 payments
  3. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc. $14,868 12 payments
  4. Ipsen Bioscience Inc $7,200 1 payment
  5. Progenics Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $6,637 3 payments
  6. Advanced Accelerator Applications $6,178 3 payments
  7. Cardinal Health 414, LLC $4,500 1 payment
  8. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $3,916 13 payments
  9. Genzyme Corporation $3,571 4 payments
  10. Lantheus Medical Imaging, Inc. $2,940 1 payment
  11. Other $5,621 19 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Consulting Fee $87,453 26 payments
  2. Grant $6,000 1 payment
  3. Travel and Lodging $5,763 22 payments
  4. Food and Beverage $3,146 51 payments
  5. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $2,940 1 payment
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Detectnet $23,288 11 payments
  2. Xofigo $12,963 10 payments
  3. Nubeqa $9,153 8 payments
  4. LUTATHERA $6,000 1 payment
  5. Cu64 Dotatate $5,198 11 payments
  6. PYLARIFY $3,437 2 payments
  7. 177Lu-PSMA-I&T $2,713 2 payments
  8. 64Cu-PSMA-I&T $2,713 2 payments
  9. Axumin $2,500 1 payment
  10. FAP-2286 $146 1 payment
  11. Other $624 14 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 1 drug

Part D claims

12

Median for Diagnostic Radiology: 24

Drug cost

$67

Median for Diagnostic Radiology: $190

Branded share of claims

0%

Median for Diagnostic Radiology: 0%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Methylprednisolone Generic 12 $67

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 1,198 Part D prescribers listed as Diagnostic Radiology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 60 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$76,294

Of which drugs: $512

Medicare patients

490

Average age 74

Services billed

5,609

183 women, 307 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 70%
Cancer 50%
Arthritis 37%
Ischemic heart disease 29%
Chronic kidney disease 28%
Diabetes 27%
Atrial fibrillation 24%
Depression 23%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Low osmolar contrast material, 300-399 mg/ml iodine concentration, per ml Q9967 Office 29 4,180 $444

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

1 product · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
LEQVIO
  • Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $37
$37 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

Records

101 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Nuclear Radiology in California

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record