Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Thomas Grace

Family Medicine Findlay, OH Medical Doctor

NPI 1295047298 CMS profile 148961

1900 S Main St, Findlay, OH 45840

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$503,109

729 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$17,238

Paid to them · 1 record reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$819,592 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2020–2025

Through program year 2025, Thomas Grace of Findlay, OH is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $503,109 across 729 general payments and $17,238 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $819,592 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 99th percentile of Family Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

8 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $79,477 97
2024 General $40,692 74
2023 General $129,609 171
2022 General $140,463 192
2022 Research $17,238 1
2021 General $86,949 116
2020 General $24,227 52
2019 General $1,691 27

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Thomas Grace
  • Family Medicine median
  • Middle half of Family Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Thomas Grace were reported at $79,477. Among 56,786 Family Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $155 and the middle half received between $45 and $549.

Show as a table
Year Thomas Grace Family Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $1,691 $150 $41–$543 $163
2020 $24,227 $120 $32–$415 $114
2021 $86,949 $137 $35–$551 $132
2022 $140,463 $137 $37–$512 $149
2023 $129,609 $149 $42–$545 $160
2024 $40,692 $156 $44–$560 $164
2025 $79,477 $155 $45–$549 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Dexcom, Inc. $216,688 239 payments
  2. Lilly USA, LLC $164,403 252 payments
  3. Novo Nordisk Inc $105,069 181 payments
  4. Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC $9,843 27 payments
  5. Insulet Corporation $3,321 8 payments
  6. Eli Lilly and Company $1,875 1 payment
  7. Tandem Diabetes Care, Inc. $1,256 5 payments
  8. Abbott Laboratories $381 11 payments
  9. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc. $125 1 payment
  10. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $118 2 payments
  11. Other $29 2 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $294,606 248 payments
  2. Compensation for serving as faculty or as a speaker for a medical education program $134,784 45 payments
  3. Travel and Lodging $34,144 158 payments
  4. Consulting Fee $27,052 14 payments
  5. Food and Beverage $11,075 261 payments
  6. Honoraria $1,400 1 payment
  7. Education $48 2 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. ZEPBOUND $111,923 138 payments
  2. DEXCOM G7 GSS (161) $106,209 118 payments
  3. RYBELSUS $64,545 131 payments
  4. Dexcom G6 Transmitter Endocrinology $61,087 80 payments
  5. DEXCOM G6 TRANSMITTER Endocrinology $35,481 26 payments
  6. Ozempic $31,770 105 payments
  7. LYUMJEV $26,048 40 payments
  8. Dexcom G6 CGM System $13,911 15 payments
  9. TOUJEO $4,261 5 payments
  10. Omnipod $3,309 7 payments
  11. Other $7,836 63 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Research payments came from Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Dexcom, Inc. $17,238 1 payment

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 44 drugs

Part D claims

2,532

Median for Family Practice: 1,826

Drug cost

$1,828,388

Median for Family Practice: $120,094

Branded share of claims

83.3%

Median for Family Practice: 18.9%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 370 $454,199
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 386 $386,159
Toujeo Max Solostar Insulin Glargine,hum.Rec.Anlog Brand 114 $193,021
Mounjaro Tirzepatide Brand 137 $164,126
Soliqua 100-33 Insulin Glargine/Lixisenatide Brand 120 $124,999
Trulicity Dulaglutide Brand 78 $80,814
Tresiba Flextouch U-200 Insulin Degludec Brand 27 $59,239
Omnipod 5 Dexg7g6 Pods (Gen 5) Insulin Pump Cart,auto,bt,g6/7 Brand 71 $47,915
Basaglar Kwikpen U-100 Insulin Glargine,hum.Rec.Anlog Brand 68 $47,058
Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 36 $40,079

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 44 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 105,120 Part D prescribers listed as Family Practice; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 10 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$17,356

Medicare's payments for the services billed

Medicare patients

114

Average age 71

Services billed

290

54 women, 60 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
Diabetes 75%
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 53%
Chronic kidney disease 41%
Ischemic heart disease 32%
Depression 23%
Heart failure 21%
Cancer 18%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

2 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
ZEPBOUND
  • Lilly USA, LLC $33,375
$33,375 — —
Ozempic
  • Novo Nordisk Inc $1,595
$1,595 370 —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

Records

730 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Family Medicine in Ohio

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record