Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Thomas Babin

Pediatrics Destrehan, LA Medical Doctor

NPI 1811991748 CMS profile 500738

141 Ormond Center Ct, Destrehan, LA 70047

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$2,505

138 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Thomas Babin of Destrehan, LA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $2,505 across 138 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 95th percentile of Pediatrics profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $334 9
2024 General $260 14
2023 General $305 16
2022 General $417 24
2021 General $417 22
2020 General $358 25
2019 General $413 28

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Thomas Babin
  • Pediatrics median
  • Middle half of Pediatrics
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Thomas Babin were reported at $334. Among 22,296 Pediatrics profiles paid that year, the median was $97 and the middle half received between $37 and $210.

Show as a table
Year Thomas Babin Pediatrics median Middle half National median
2019 $413 $86 $31–$183 $163
2020 $358 $49 $22–$110 $114
2021 $417 $68 $27–$158 $132
2022 $417 $77 $30–$173 $149
2023 $305 $88 $33–$190 $160
2024 $260 $94 $34–$206 $164
2025 $334 $97 $37–$210 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Tris Pharma Inc $518 37 payments
  2. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $487 14 payments
  3. Neos Therapeutics, LP $345 25 payments
  4. Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $221 10 payments
  5. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corporation $169 11 payments
  6. Pfizer Inc. $149 7 payments
  7. Corium, Inc. $119 6 payments
  8. Ironshore Pharmaceuticals Inc. $96 5 payments
  9. Adlon Therapeutics L.P. $94 6 payments
  10. Genentech USA, Inc. $72 4 payments
  11. Other $236 13 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $2,435 137 payments
  2. Consulting Fee $70 1 payment
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. COTEMPLA XR-ODT $311 23 payments
  2. BEXSERO $295 12 payments
  3. Adzenys XR-ODT $232 18 payments
  4. Dyanavel XR $173 12 payments
  5. Qelbree $170 7 payments
  6. GARDASIL 9 $157 10 payments
  7. Quillivant $152 10 payments
  8. Quillivant XR $151 11 payments
  9. PENMENVY $147 2 payments
  10. VAXELIS $126 8 payments
  11. Other $1,514 82 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Records

138 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Pediatrics in Louisiana

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record