Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Thomas Abell

Ophthalmology Campbellsville, KY Medical Doctor

NPI 1033140918 CMS profile 183425

1800 Old Lebanon Rd, Campbellsville, KY 42718

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$4,129

89 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Thomas Abell of Campbellsville, KY is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $4,129 across 89 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 76th percentile of Ophthalmology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $23 1
2024 General $24 1
2023 General $269 8
2022 General $386 22
2021 General $795 23
2020 General $350 14
2019 General $2,282 20

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Thomas Abell
  • Ophthalmology median
  • Middle half of Ophthalmology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Thomas Abell were reported at $23. Among 13,034 Ophthalmology profiles paid that year, the median was $384 and the middle half received between $136 and $917.

Show as a table
Year Thomas Abell Ophthalmology median Middle half National median
2019 $2,282 $258 $104–$655 $163
2020 $350 $126 $45–$321 $114
2021 $795 $205 $76–$534 $132
2022 $386 $266 $100–$678 $149
2023 $269 $308 $117–$745 $160
2024 $24 $340 $127–$846 $164
2025 $23 $384 $136–$917 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Alcon Vision LLC $2,883 50 payments
  2. Bausch & Lomb, a division of Bausch Health US, LLC $258 3 payments
  3. Allergan Inc. $227 13 payments
  4. Kala Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $183 3 payments
  5. Johnson & Johnson Surgical Vision, Inc. $121 3 payments
  6. Bausch Health US, LLC $102 1 payment
  7. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $83 4 payments
  8. Marco Ophthalmic, Inc. $80 4 payments
  9. Carl Zeiss Meditec, Inc. $58 1 payment
  10. AbbVie, Inc. $48 2 payments
  11. Other $86 5 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $2,697 82 payments
  2. Travel and Lodging $1,369 5 payments
  3. Gift $64 2 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. DAILIES $1,075 2 payments
  2. AcrySof IQ PanOptix $258 6 payments
  3. ARGOS $203 7 payments
  4. INVELTYS $183 3 payments
  5. EYSUVIS $183 3 payments
  6. DURYSTA $180 10 payments
  7. Centurion Ophthalmology $149 2 payments
  8. Centurion Ophthalmology $117 1 payment
  9. Clareon $113 7 payments
  10. VYZULTA $98 1 payment
  11. Other $1,087 47 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 6 drugs

Part D claims

136

Median for Ophthalmology: 891

Drug cost

$1,512

Median for Ophthalmology: $68,233

Branded share of claims

33.1%

Median for Ophthalmology: 29.7%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Ketorolac Tromethamine Generic 18 $562
Latanoprost Generic 61 $400
Neomycin-Polymyxin-Dexameth Neomycin/Polymyxin B/Dexametha Brand 20 $233
Erythromycin Erythromycin Base Brand 12 $148
Dorzolamide-Timolol Dorzolamide Hcl/Timolol Maleat Brand 13 $101
Brimonidine Tartrate Generic 12 $68

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 18,260 Part D prescribers listed as Ophthalmology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Payments and prescribing

1 product · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
DURYSTA
  • AbbVie, Inc. $24
$24 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

Records

89 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Ophthalmology in Kentucky

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record