Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Tho Nguyen

Procedural Dermatology Hurst, TX Medical Doctor

NPI 1861462020 CMS profile 39382

1733 Precinct Line Rd, Hurst, TX 76054

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$15,841

714 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$249,861 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2019–2022

Through program year 2025, Tho Nguyen of Hurst, TX is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $15,841 across 714 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $249,861 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 84th percentile of Procedural Dermatology profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $1,725 87
2024 General $1,903 112
2023 General $2,469 131
2022 General $1,829 89
2021 General $1,852 99
2020 General $2,909 81
2019 General $3,155 115

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Tho Nguyen
  • Procedural Dermatology median
  • Middle half of Procedural Dermatology
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Tho Nguyen were reported at $1,725. Among 381 Procedural Dermatology profiles paid that year, the median was $592 and the middle half received between $144 and $1,778.

Show as a table
Year Tho Nguyen Procedural Dermatology median Middle half National median
2019 $3,155 $454 $152–$1,260 $163
2020 $2,909 $243 $90–$835 $114
2021 $1,852 $337 $102–$1,128 $132
2022 $1,829 $443 $119–$1,654 $149
2023 $2,469 $583 $137–$1,838 $160
2024 $1,903 $611 $132–$1,835 $164
2025 $1,725 $592 $144–$1,778 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Janssen Biotech, Inc. $3,104 257 payments
  2. Galderma Laboratories, L.P. $2,562 45 payments
  3. AbbVie, Inc. $1,412 72 payments
  4. Merz North America, Inc. $1,234 11 payments
  5. Genzyme Corporation $1,217 45 payments
  6. Regeneron Healthcare Solutions, Inc. $735 28 payments
  7. Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Inc. $701 19 payments
  8. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $569 19 payments
  9. Amgen Inc. $446 25 payments
  10. Pfizer Inc. $371 25 payments
  11. Other $3,491 168 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $14,164 708 payments
  2. Consulting Fee $1,313 1 payment
  3. Education $364 5 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. TREMFYA $2,647 211 payments
  2. ORACEA $2,007 21 payments
  3. DUPIXENT Immunology $1,366 49 payments
  4. SKYRIZI $1,006 48 payments
  5. STELARA $950 87 payments
  6. DUPIXENT Inflammation And Immunology $735 28 payments
  7. SIMPONI ARIA $653 61 payments
  8. SIMPONI $653 61 payments
  9. Absorica LD $572 13 payments
  10. ASCLERA $537 4 payments
  11. Other $9,086 400 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 16 drugs

Part D claims

401

Median for Dermatology: 534

Drug cost

$59,254

Median for Dermatology: $67,151

Branded share of claims

6%

Median for Dermatology: 8.1%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Dupixent Pen Dupilumab Brand 13 $45,393
Pimecrolimus Generic 11 $2,333
Clobetasol Propionate Generic 42 $2,078
Tacrolimus Generic 15 $1,935
Betamethasone Dipropionate Generic 36 $1,463
Mycophenolate Mofetil Generic 18 $1,256
Fluorouracil Generic 14 $1,160
Triamcinolone Acetonide Generic 76 $765
Doxycycline Hyclate Generic 32 $701
Ketoconazole Generic 37 $636

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 16 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 13,550 Part D prescribers listed as Dermatology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 58 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$80,571

Of which drugs: $62

Medicare patients

443

Average age 75

Services billed

1,593

177 women, 266 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 46%
Ischemic heart disease 30%
Diabetes 27%
Chronic kidney disease 26%
Atrial fibrillation 17%
Cancer 17%
Depression 14%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, triamcinolone acetonide, not otherwise specified, 10 mg J3301 Office 27 89 $62

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 24 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
TREMFYA
$826 — —
Otezla
$155 — —
DUPIXENT
$148 13 —
Vemlidy
$121 — —
SOTYKTU
$91 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 24 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

714 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Procedural Dermatology in Texas

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record