Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Than Aung

Internal Medicine Redding, CA Medical Doctor

NPI 1578504841 CMS profile 297933

2421 Old Eureka Way, Redding, CA 96001

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$16,082

871 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Than Aung of Redding, CA is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $16,082 across 871 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 96th percentile of Internal Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $1,484 69
2024 General $2,067 108
2023 General $1,847 103
2022 General $2,056 94
2021 General $2,955 166
2020 General $3,378 193
2019 General $2,294 138

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Than Aung
  • Internal Medicine median
  • Middle half of Internal Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Than Aung were reported at $1,484. Among 52,115 Internal Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $156 and the middle half received between $47 and $551.

Show as a table
Year Than Aung Internal Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $2,294 $159 $48–$570 $163
2020 $3,378 $119 $33–$402 $114
2021 $2,955 $135 $37–$521 $132
2022 $2,056 $141 $42–$496 $149
2023 $1,847 $149 $45–$519 $160
2024 $2,067 $154 $47–$537 $164
2025 $1,484 $156 $47–$551 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $2,203 122 payments
  2. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $1,531 77 payments
  3. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $1,471 69 payments
  4. Pfizer Inc. $1,394 64 payments
  5. Lilly USA, LLC $1,325 66 payments
  6. Amgen Inc. $1,063 72 payments
  7. Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc $701 47 payments
  8. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $680 42 payments
  9. Novo Nordisk Inc $609 38 payments
  10. Amarin Pharma Inc. $590 36 payments
  11. Other $4,515 238 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $15,838 861 payments
  2. Education $223 9 payments
  3. Long term medical supply or device loan $20 1 payment
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. FARXIGA $1,274 59 payments
  2. JARDIANCE Diabetes $1,025 52 payments
  3. JARDIANCE Diabetes $809 36 payments
  4. UBRELVY $757 41 payments
  5. Repatha $748 52 payments
  6. CREON $729 35 payments
  7. Otezla $702 48 payments
  8. Ozempic $561 36 payments
  9. XARELTO $555 41 payments
  10. RYBELSUS $521 34 payments
  11. Other $14,304 741 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 279 drugs

Part D claims

26,428

Median for Internal Medicine: 777

Drug cost

$1,855,325

Median for Internal Medicine: $73,373

Branded share of claims

21.5%

Median for Internal Medicine: 19.3%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 405 $292,216
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 144 $181,627
Farxiga Dapagliflozin Propanediol Brand 204 $135,148
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 160 $106,738
Mounjaro Tirzepatide Brand 88 $91,658
Trelegy Ellipta Fluticasone/Umeclidin/Vilanter Brand 94 $82,852
Xarelto Rivaroxaban Brand 104 $72,503
Januvia Sitagliptin Phosphate Brand 95 $45,090
Linzess Linaclotide Brand 75 $43,029
Rexulti Brexpiprazole Brand 54 $39,843

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 279 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 104,182 Part D prescribers listed as Internal Medicine; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 43 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$823,636

Of which drugs: $71,206

Medicare patients

1,810

Average age 78

Services billed

11,139

1,000 women, 810 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 75%
Arthritis 39%
Diabetes 29%
Ischemic heart disease 29%
Atrial fibrillation 27%
Chronic kidney disease 25%
Heart failure 23%
Osteoporosis 22%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Pcv20 vaccine im 90677 Office 152 152 $43,670
Vaccine for influenza for injection into muscle 90662 Office 258 261 $20,150
Vaccine for influenza for administration into muscle, 0.5 ml dosage 90656 Office 278 279 $6,088
Injection, triamcinolone acetonide, not otherwise specified, 10 mg J3301 Office 40 248 $168
Injection, ketorolac tromethamine, per 15 mg J1885 Office 39 200 $96

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 37 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
JARDIANCE
$294 160 —
Sunosi
$118 — —
FARXIGA
$95 204 —
Repatha
$81 — —
UBRELVY
$76 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 37 with Patron

Records

871 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Internal Medicine in California

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record