Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Terence Cooney

Internal Medicine Omaha, NE Medical Doctor

NPI 1316051584 CMS profile 105167

8901 W Dodge Rd, Omaha, NE 68114

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$7,847

566 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$0

Paid to them · None reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Through program year 2025, Terence Cooney of Omaha, NE is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $7,847 across 566 general payments and $0 in research payments paid to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them.

General payments for this record sit in the 93rd percentile of Internal Medicine profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

7 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $884 55
2024 General $1,608 98
2023 General $1,632 106
2022 General $1,493 113
2021 General $677 48
2020 General $137 10
2019 General $1,416 136

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Terence Cooney
  • Internal Medicine median
  • Middle half of Internal Medicine
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Terence Cooney were reported at $884. Among 52,115 Internal Medicine profiles paid that year, the median was $156 and the middle half received between $47 and $551.

Show as a table
Year Terence Cooney Internal Medicine median Middle half National median
2019 $1,416 $159 $48–$570 $163
2020 $137 $119 $33–$402 $114
2021 $677 $135 $37–$521 $132
2022 $1,493 $141 $42–$496 $149
2023 $1,632 $149 $45–$519 $160
2024 $1,608 $154 $47–$537 $164
2025 $884 $156 $47–$551 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AbbVie, Inc. $1,124 67 payments
  2. Pfizer Inc. $749 60 payments
  3. Lilly USA, LLC $586 53 payments
  4. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $573 45 payments
  5. Novo Nordisk Inc $492 55 payments
  6. Otsuka America Pharmaceutical, Inc. $387 24 payments
  7. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $384 14 payments
  8. Amgen Inc. $354 30 payments
  9. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. $301 34 payments
  10. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc. $247 15 payments
  11. Other $2,650 169 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Food and Beverage $7,809 563 payments
  2. Education $38 3 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. UBRELVY $437 24 payments
  2. QULIPTA $432 19 payments
  3. Ozempic $403 46 payments
  4. REXULTI $387 24 payments
  5. ELIQUIS $288 22 payments
  6. NURTEC ODT $274 21 payments
  7. MOUNJARO $271 20 payments
  8. LINZESS $261 19 payments
  9. Kerendia $247 15 payments
  10. SPIRIVA RESPIMAT $245 21 payments
  11. Other $8,024 558 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 194 drugs

Part D claims

14,706

Median for Internal Medicine: 777

Drug cost

$1,110,198

Median for Internal Medicine: $73,373

Branded share of claims

18.5%

Median for Internal Medicine: 19.3%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 228 $193,087
Ozempic Semaglutide Brand 145 $152,204
Mounjaro Tirzepatide Brand 81 $94,717
Jardiance Empagliflozin Brand 82 $77,024
Januvia Sitagliptin Phosphate Brand 51 $58,870
Xarelto Rivaroxaban Brand 46 $57,531
Tresiba Flextouch U-200 Insulin Degludec Brand 49 $44,851
Myrbetriq Mirabegron Brand 53 $41,339
Trelegy Ellipta Fluticasone/Umeclidin/Vilanter Brand 36 $32,568
Trulicity Dulaglutide Brand 16 $24,111

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 194 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 104,182 Part D prescribers listed as Internal Medicine; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 105 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$286,989

Of which drugs: $58,582

Medicare patients

552

Average age 76

Services billed

12,700

293 women, 259 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
High blood pressure 73%
Arthritis 53%
Atrial fibrillation 24%
Ischemic heart disease 23%
Diabetes 21%
Chronic kidney disease 21%
Cancer 19%
Depression 17%
Drugs given in the clinic that this provider billed Medicare Part B for
Drug given in the clinic Where Patients Services Paid by Medicare
Injection, denosumab, 1 mg J0897 Office 20 2,160 $43,875
Pcv20 vaccine im 90677 Office 23 23 $6,681
Vaccine for influenza for injection into muscle 90662 Office 52 52 $4,255
Sarscv2 vac 30mcg trs-suc im 91320 Office 18 20 $2,910
Injection, triamcinolone acetonide, not otherwise specified, 10 mg J3301 Office 51 526 $385

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 39 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
LEQVIO
  • Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation $79
$79 — —
MOUNJARO
  • Lilly USA, LLC $77
$77 81 —
XIFAXAN
  • Salix Pharmaceuticals, a division of Bausch Health US, LLC $77
$77 — —
Austedo XR
  • Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. $76
$76 — —
TZIELD
  • SANOFI-AVENTIS U.S. LLC $74
$74 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See more in the dashboard: 25 with a free account, all 39 with Patron

Records

566 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Internal Medicine in Nebraska

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record