Medical Doctor Program year 2025 Reported 2019–2025 Source: CMS Open Payments, 2026 publication

Tejas Patil

Hospitalist Aurora, CO Medical Doctor

NPI 1336482769 CMS profile 4326615

12801 E 17Th Ave Fl 81018, Aurora, CO 80045

Open in the dashboard

General payments

$93,946

100 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Research payments

$2,524

Paid to them · 3 records reported · program years 2019–2025

Ownership & investment interest

$0

None reported

Research they led as principal investigator

$1,402,276 paid to institutions, not to them · program years 2021–2025

Through program year 2025, Tejas Patil of Aurora, CO is reported in the CMS Open Payments database as having received $93,946 across 100 general payments and $2,524 in research payments paid to them. Separately, studies naming them as principal investigator received $1,402,276 in research payments, paid to institutions rather than to them.

No combined total General, research and ownership are kept apart. Each is reported under its own rules, and ownership is not money that moved at all but the value of a stake held. A meal, a clinical trial grant and a shareholding do not add up to anything meaningful, so this site does not add them. The principal-investigator line is research money paid to institutions for studies they led — not to them — and is not added to anything either.

General payments for this record sit in the 99th percentile of Hospitalist profiles with reported payments. Percentile describes the distribution, not the conduct.

By program year

9 rows
Year Kind Relative to this record's peak year Amount Records
2025 General $29,556 27
2025 Research $557 2
2024 General $23,462 35
2023 General $29,421 19
2022 General $3,806 7
2022 Research $1,968 1
2021 General $6,079 5
2020 General $1,278 3
2019 General $343 4

Beside peers

Year by year, beside peers General payments · among profiles paid that year
  • Tejas Patil
  • Hospitalist median
  • Middle half of Hospitalist
  • National median

In program year 2025, general payments to Tejas Patil were reported at $29,556. Among 6,882 Hospitalist profiles paid that year, the median was $86 and the middle half received between $30 and $191.

Show as a table
Year Tejas Patil Hospitalist median Middle half National median
2019 $343 $96 $28–$201 $163
2020 $1,278 $48 $19–$125 $114
2021 $6,079 $70 $23–$167 $132
2022 $3,806 $85 $27–$174 $149
2023 $29,421 $89 $30–$191 $160
2024 $23,462 $95 $29–$204 $164
2025 $29,556 $86 $30–$191 $169

Breakdown

Who paid General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $15,644 17 payments
  2. Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc. $9,206 9 payments
  3. Gilead Sciences, Inc. $8,781 5 payments
  4. E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $8,204 6 payments
  5. BeiGene Switzerland GmbH $7,500 2 payments
  6. Partner Therapeutics, Inc. $6,787 14 payments
  7. Pfizer Inc. $5,516 4 payments
  8. Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. $4,832 4 payments
  9. Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC $4,525 7 payments
  10. Eli Lilly and Company $4,438 3 payments
  11. Other $18,513 29 payments

Every payment, record by record

What the payments were for General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. Consulting Fee $80,317 37 payments
  2. Compensation for services other than consulting, including serving as faculty or as a speaker at a venue other than a continuing education program $6,228 5 payments
  3. Honoraria $2,770 2 payments
  4. Food and Beverage $2,401 39 payments
  5. Travel and Lodging $2,069 15 payments
  6. Education $162 2 payments
Products named General payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. RYBREVANT $10,355 16 payments
  2. ALUNBRIG $9,163 8 payments
  3. TAGRISSO $7,788 7 payments
  4. LIBTAYO $7,248 6 payments
  5. BIZENGRI $5,796 6 payments
  6. LORBRENA $2,996 3 payments
  7. XALKORI $2,520 1 payment
  8. ZEPZELCA $2,518 2 payments
  9. AUGTYRO $2,175 1 payment
  10. IMFINZI $2,173 3 payments
  11. Other $2,904 17 payments

A payment can name more than one product, so these amounts overlap and do not add up to the general-payment figure.

Research payments came from Research payments · program years 2019–2025
  1. F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG $2,524 3 payments

Prescribing to Medicare patients

Part D · data year 2024 · 19 drugs

Part D claims

476

Median for Medical Oncology: 414

Drug cost

$2,539,240

Median for Medical Oncology: $849,427

Branded share of claims

47.3%

Median for Medical Oncology: 28.5%

Drugs this doctor was counted under in Medicare Part D 2024, by drug cost
Drug Type Relative to their largest Claims Drug cost
Tagrisso Osimertinib Mesylate Brand 76 $1,133,050
Alecensa Alectinib Hcl Brand 29 $498,755
Retevmo Selpercatinib Brand 19 $355,247
Lorbrena Lorlatinib Brand 12 $251,352
Lumakras Sotorasib Brand 11 $233,446
Eliquis Apixaban Brand 33 $40,321
Xarelto Rivaroxaban Brand 21 $23,403
Levetiracetam Generic 14 $716
Oxycodone Hcl Generic 31 $689
Prochlorperazine Maleate Generic 46 $574

The 10 drugs with the highest cost, of 19 counted.

Drug cost is what was paid for the drugs at the pharmacy — by Medicare, the patient and others — and is not money to the prescriber. Medicare Part D only: drugs dispensed to Medicare beneficiaries. A drug with fewer than 11 claims for this prescriber is not published, so a missing drug does not mean zero. The medians are for the 3,431 Part D prescribers listed as Medical Oncology; they describe a distribution and say nothing about conduct.

Billing to Medicare

Part B · data year 2024 · 12 billing codes

Paid by Medicare

$49,895

Medicare's payments for the services billed

Medicare patients

143

Average age 72

Services billed

509

77 women, 66 men among their patients

Share of this provider's Medicare patients with each condition
Condition among their Medicare patients Relative to the most common Share of patients
Cancer 75%
High blood pressure 66%
Arthritis 43%
COPD 41%
Ischemic heart disease 31%
Chronic kidney disease 30%
Depression 23%
Diabetes 21%

Medicare Part B only: services billed to Medicare. Rows covering fewer than 11 beneficiaries are not published. Only drugs given in the clinic are itemised here; the rest of what this provider billed is in the total above.

Payments and prescribing

First 5 of 6 products · payments 2024

Two separate records. The payments come from Open Payments and the claims from Medicare. They are set side by side because they name the same product; they do not show that a payment affected a prescription.

Products this doctor was paid in connection with in 2024, beside Medicare claims for the same product
Product Paid by Related payments Part D claims Part B services
ALUNBRIG
  • Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A., Inc. $8,033
$8,033 — —
LORBRENA
  • PFIZER INC. $2,996
$2,996 12 —
AUGTYRO
  • E.R. Squibb & Sons, L.L.C. $2,175
$2,175 — —
RYBREVANT
  • Janssen Biotech, Inc. $1,363
  • Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC $263
$1,625 — —
ENHERTU
  • AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP $57
$57 — —

A dash means Medicare published no figure for this doctor and product — fewer than 11 claims, or the product is not covered under that part — which is not the same as none. Payments are general payments only; one that names several products is split evenly between them, so an amount is payments related to the product, not money paid for it.

See all 6 in the dashboard with a free account

Records

103 reported

Every payment, record by record

Date, company, amount, what it was for and the product named — filter by year, kind and company, or download as CSV.

Other Hospitalist in Colorado

Related records

What this means

U.S. law requires drug and medical device manufacturers to report payments and transfers of value they make to physicians and teaching hospitals. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services publishes that record each year. This page shows what was reported about this person, and nothing else.

An ownership interest is different from the other two. It is not a payment: it is a stake — shares, options, a partnership holding — that a physician or an immediate family member held in a manufacturer during that year. The figure shown is what the stake was reported to be worth.

Research payments frequently pass through a clinician to the institution running a trial, and rarely represent personal income. They should be read differently from general payments.

Provenance

Source: CMS Open Payments · through program year 2025

Data current to program year 2025, from CMS's 2026 publication.

We reproduce what manufacturers reported. We do not verify, edit or correct the underlying records.

A payment record is not evidence of wrongdoing. Financial relationships between industry and medicine are legal, common and often necessary for research. Who Paid My Doc reports what was disclosed; it does not judge it.

Who Paid My Doc is independent and is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by CMS or any U.S. government agency. It is not a consumer reporting agency and this is not a consumer report; do not use it for decisions covered by the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

How to dispute or correct a record